Subject: [PATCH 4/6] edac: Document Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver binding

From: [email-masked] (Stephen Boyd)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:00:59 -0700

On 10/29/13 01:21, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> The Krait L1/L2 error reporting device is made up of two
>> interrupts, one per-CPU interrupt for the L1 caches and one
>> interrupt for the L2 cache.
>>
>> Cc: <[email-masked]>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email-masked]>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,krait-cache-erp.txt     | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,krait-cache-erp.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,krait-cache-erp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,krait-cache-erp.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..01fe8a8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,krait-cache-erp.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>> +* Qualcomm Krait L1 / L2 cache error reporting
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: Should be "qcom,krait-cache-erp"
>> +- interrupts: Should contain the L1/CPU error interrupt number and
>> +  then the L2 cache error interrupt number
>> +
>> +Optional properties:
>> +- interrupt-names: Should contain the interrupt names "l1_irq" and
>> +  "l2_irq"
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +	edac {
>> +		compatible = "qcom,krait-cache-erp";
>> +		interrupts = <1 9 0xf04>, <0 2 0x4>;
>> +	};
> Why wouldn't we have these as part of cache nodes in the dts?  (which begs the question why we don't have cache nodes?)
>

I can certainly add cache nodes and cpu nodes and then put the
interrupts in those nodes. I was thinking along those same lines when I
ported this driver but figured it would be good to get something out
there. The only question I have is how am I supposed to hook that up
into the linux device model? Will the edac driver bind to the device
created for the cpus node and the cache node? I guess it will have to be
a driver that binds to two devices.

One could argue that we should put the cp15 based architected timers in
the cpus node also but so far nobody has done that and I think there was
some reasoning behind that, Mark?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation