Subject: [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio

From: [email-masked] (Sekhar Nori)
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 16:19:43 +0530

On Wednesday 06 November 2013 03:45 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Linus Walleij <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Prabhakar Lad
>> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Linus Walleij <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar
>>>> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <[email-masked]>
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch fixes the check for the offset in
>>>>> gpio_to_irq_unbanked() function.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <[email-masked]>
>>>>
>>>> Is this a regression that should go in right now?
>>>>
>>> Yes it needs too.
>>
>> But on top of *what* exactly?
>>
>> This does not apply to my gpio tree devel branch and
>> not even on the mainline kernel.
>>
> Looks like this needs to go via ARM tree as the earlier
> patches have  gone via ARM tree itself [1].
> If you can ACK it Sekhar can get it in via ARM tree.

The dependent patches are all in linux-next through ARM SoC queued for
v3.13 merge. This fix can either be sent late in merge cycle once Linus
has pulled ARM SoC or after v3.13-rc1 comes out.

Thanks,
Sekhar