Subject: [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio

From: [email-masked] (Sekhar Nori)
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 17:12:47 +0530

Hi Grygorii,

On Wednesday 06 November 2013 05:03 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Sekhar, Linus,
> 
> On 11/06/2013 12:49 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Wednesday 06 November 2013 03:45 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>>> Hi Linus,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Linus Walleij
>>> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Prabhakar Lad
>>>> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Linus Walleij
>>>>> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar
>>>>>> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <[email-masked]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch fixes the check for the offset in
>>>>>>> gpio_to_irq_unbanked() function.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <[email-masked]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this a regression that should go in right now?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes it needs too.
>>>>
>>>> But on top of *what* exactly?
>>>>
>>>> This does not apply to my gpio tree devel branch and
>>>> not even on the mainline kernel.
>>>>
>>> Looks like this needs to go via ARM tree as the earlier
>>> patches have  gone via ARM tree itself [1].
>>> If you can ACK it Sekhar can get it in via ARM tree.
>>
>> The dependent patches are all in linux-next through ARM SoC queued for
>> v3.13 merge. This fix can either be sent late in merge cycle once Linus
>> has pulled ARM SoC or after v3.13-rc1 comes out.
> 
> Pls, wait a bit - this fix is incomplete :( The below changes have to be
> done too:

Can either you or Prabhakar send a separate patch (series) with only the
fixes?

Thanks,
Sekhar