From: sboyd@codeaurora•org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] genirq: arm64: perf: support for percpu pmu interrupt
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:04:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527D8A17.9020208@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383739658-10036-1-git-send-email-vkale@apm.com>
On 11/06/13 04:07, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> This patch series adds support to handle interrupt registration/deregistration
> in arm64 pmu driver when pmu interrupt type is percpu.
>
> Patches in this patch series were previously sent out as separate patches [1].
> This patch series incorporates comments/fixes suggested for original patches.
>
> [1]
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/205888.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/204414.html
>
> Vinayak Kale (2):
> genirq: error reporting in request_percpu_irq() and
> request_threaded_irq()
> arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 12 +++--
> 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
What ever happened to the approach here[1]? It doesn't look very nice to
have to request the irq first as a per-cpu interrupt and then try as a
non-percpu interrupt when genirq already knows if its per-cpu or not.
[1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1207.3/02955.html
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-09 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-06 12:07 [PATCH 0/2] genirq: arm64: perf: support for percpu pmu interrupt Vinayak Kale
2013-11-06 12:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] genirq: error reporting in request_percpu_irq() and request_threaded_irq() Vinayak Kale
2013-11-06 12:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt Vinayak Kale
2013-11-08 15:57 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 9:30 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-09 1:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-09 1:04 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-11-11 9:25 ` [PATCH 0/2] genirq: arm64: perf: " Vinayak Kale
2013-11-11 10:44 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 12:33 ` Ganapat Rao P Kulkarni
2013-11-12 6:00 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-12 8:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527D8A17.9020208@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox