From: santosh.shilimkar@ti•com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: mm: Drop the lowmem watermark check from virt_addr_valid()
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:55:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528635D4.4090605@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <528608E9.1060407@arm.com>
On Friday 15 November 2013 06:43 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 15/11/13 00:22, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 02:37:43PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>> >> Slab allocator can allocate memory beyond the lowmem watermark
>>> >> which can lead to false failure of virt_addr_valid().
>>> >>
>>> >> So drop the check. The issue was seen with percpu_alloc()
>>> >> in KVM code which was allocating memory beyond lowmem watermark.
>>> >>
>>> >> Am not completly sure whether this is the right fix and if it could
>>> >> impact any other user of virt_addr_valid(). Without this fix as
>>> >> pointed out the KVM init was failing in my testing.
>>> >>
>>> >> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro•org>
>>> >> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm•com>
>>> >> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm•linux.org.uk>
>>> >> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm•com>
>>> >> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm•com>
>>> >>
>>> >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti•com>
>>> >> ---
>>> >> arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h | 3 +--
>>> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> >>
>>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
>>> >> index 4dd2145..412da47 100644
>>> >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
>>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
>>> >> @@ -343,8 +343,7 @@ static inline __deprecated void *bus_to_virt(unsigned long x)
>>> >> #define ARCH_PFN_OFFSET PHYS_PFN_OFFSET
>>> >>
>>> >> #define virt_to_page(kaddr) pfn_to_page(__pa(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
>>> >> -#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) ((unsigned long)(kaddr) >= PAGE_OFFSET && (unsigned long)(kaddr) < (unsigned long)high_memory)
>>> >> -
>>> >> +#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) ((unsigned long)(kaddr) >= PAGE_OFFSET)
>>> >> #endif
>>> >>
>>> >> #include <asm-generic/memory_model.h>
>>> >> --
>>> >> 1.7.9.5
>>> >>
>> >
>> > This looks wrong to me. Check Documentation/arm/memory.txt, this would
>> > return true for the VMALLOC region, which would cause virt_to_phys to
>> > give you something invalid, which would be bad.
>> >
>> > We use the check in create_hyp_mappings to be sure that the physical
>> > address returned by virt_to_phys is valid and that if we're mapping more
>> > than one page that those pages are physically contiguous.
>> >
>> > So if you want to get rid of this check, you need to change the mapping
>> > functionality to obtain the physical address by walking the page table
>> > mappings for each page that you are mapping instead. Or limit each call
>> > to a single page in size and take the physical address as input and use
>> > per_cpu_ptr_to_phys at the caller side instead.
>> >
>> > Alternatively, we need to get rid of alloc_percpu and use regular
>> > kmallocs instead, unless anyone else knows of an even better way.
> alloc_percpu has nice properties (cache locality, mostly).
>
> One way out of it would be to give percpu stuff a special treatment. Can
> you try the attach patch as a first approximation? It needs more
> refinements (allocations straddling two pages?), but I think that's the
> right sort of things.
>
> Let me know how it works for you.
>
Host boots bug guest fails. Patch needs small update as mentioned
with inline patch.
> From 01bc1c8eaebdd70b1ea044050144b9bfb3375f82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm•com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:36:36 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] arm/arm64: KVM: introduce new mapping API for percpu mappings
>
> Using virt_to_phys on percpu mappings is horribly wrong (my own bad).
> Thankfully, the kernel offers a way to obtain the phisical address
> of such a mapping.
>
> Add a new "create_hyp_percpu_mappings" to deal with those.
>
> *Fully untested, don't merge*
>
> Not-Even-Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm•com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 1 +
> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> index 9b28c41..6dcb9ff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>
> int create_hyp_mappings(void *from, void *to);
> +int create_hyp_percpu_mappings(void *from, void *to);
> int create_hyp_io_mappings(void *from, void *to, phys_addr_t);
> void free_boot_hyp_pgd(void);
> void free_hyp_pgds(void);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index 9c697db..6191960 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ static int init_hyp_mode(void)
> kvm_cpu_context_t *cpu_ctxt;
>
> cpu_ctxt = per_cpu_ptr(kvm_host_cpu_state, cpu);
> - err = create_hyp_mappings(cpu_ctxt, cpu_ctxt + 1);
> + err = create_hyp_percpu_mappings(cpu_ctxt, cpu_ctxt + 1);
>
> if (err) {
> kvm_err("Cannot map host CPU state: %d\n", err);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> index b0de86b..e509718 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,26 @@ int create_hyp_mappings(void *from, void *to)
> }
>
> /**
> + * create_hyp_percpu_mappings - duplicate a percpu kernel virtual address
> + * range in Hyp mode
> + * @from: The virtual kernel start address of the range
> + * @to: The virtual kernel end address of the range (exclusive)
> + *
> + * The same virtual address as the kernel virtual address is also used
> + * in Hyp-mode mapping (modulo HYP_PAGE_OFFSET) to the same underlying
> + * physical pages. It *has* to be a percpu pointer.
> + */
> +int create_hyp_percpu_mappings(void *from, void *to)
> +{
> + unsigned long phys_addr = per_cpu_ptr_to_phys(from);
phys_addr_t phys_addr = per_cpu_ptr_to_phys(from);
With this change things work as expected without $subject patch.
Thanks for the patch.
Regards,
Ssantosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-15 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-14 19:37 [PATCH 0/6] ARM/AMR64: Few patches on kvm and mm code Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-14 19:37 ` [PATCH 1/6] arm64: mm: Add __virt_to_idmap() to keep kvm build happy Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 13:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-11-15 14:55 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 14:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-11-15 15:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 15:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-15 15:25 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 15:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-15 15:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-11-15 15:33 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-14 19:37 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: kvm: Use virt_to_idmap instead of virt_to_phys for idmap mappings Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 0:12 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-14 19:37 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: mm: Drop the lowmem watermark check from virt_addr_valid() Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 0:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-15 0:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 0:40 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-15 11:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-15 11:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-15 14:55 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-11-15 15:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-15 15:46 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-15 14:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-15 15:40 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-14 19:37 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm64: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 13:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-11-15 14:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-15 14:57 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-14 19:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: kvm: Use phys_addr_t instead of unsigned long in mm code Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 0:09 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-15 0:10 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 11:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-14 19:37 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: kvm: TMP: Commit the hyp page tables to main memory Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-14 22:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 0:11 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-15 0:15 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 0:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-15 0:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 0:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-15 1:19 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-15 1:35 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528635D4.4090605@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox