public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti•com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] PM / Clocks: fix pm_clk_resume/suspend if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is set
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:01:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <528FAA00.9060801@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ppps6zve.fsf@linaro.org>

On Friday 22 November 2013 01:43 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti•com> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>> It looks like even if you just remove the locks here, the PM core is
>>>> free to call this function with irqs disabled if pm_runtime_irq_safe()
>>>> has been called on the device. Perhaps runtime PM can only do the
>>>> clk_enable()/clk_disable() part and the clk_unprepare()/clk_prepare()
>>>> calls should happen in the system suspend callbacks?
>>>
>>> Even don't know what to say :( On Keystone clk_unprepare()/clk_prepare() are NOPs.
>>> But clk_prepare() has to be called at least once before clk_enable() :((
>>> So, solution with suspend/resume will not fix current problem :( unfortunately.
>>>
>>> FYI, Now pm_clk_suspend/pm_clk_resume are called from arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
>>> (also similar solution is used by Davinci, but issue has not been detected because
>>> PM runtime hasn't been used by Davinci IP drivers before)
>>>
>> One way to deal with this is to have clk_unprepare()/clk_prepare()
>> called from dev_pm_domain ops before calling pm_clk_[suspend/resume]() if we
>> can't have that as part of runtime code.
> 
> That doesn't solve the irq_safe problem that Stephen pointed out without
> being very careful.  Basically, if you have _any_ potentially sleeping
> calls in this path, you can never allow devices to use
> pm_runtime_irq_safe().
> 
You are right. I realized that after reading the code.

> Also, I don't like having the clk_enable in the PM core but the
> clk_prepare in the platform-specific pm_domain.  That seems prone for
> platforms to get wrong.
> 
Agree.

> I'll need to think about this a little more before having any idea what
> to do here.
> 
Thanks Kevin for looking into it.

Regards,
Santosh

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-22 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-20 13:31 [PATCH] PM / Clocks: fix pm_clk_resume/suspend if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is set Grygorii Strashko
2013-11-20 18:42 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-20 19:06   ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-11-20 19:53     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-20 20:11       ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-11-20 20:32         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-22 18:43           ` Kevin Hilman
2013-11-22 19:01             ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-11-25 10:05               ` Grygorii Strashko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=528FAA00.9060801@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox