Subject: [PATCH v6] ARM: omap: edma: add suspend suspend/resume hooks

From: [email-masked] (Daniel Mack)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:47:50 +0100

Hi Sekhar,

On 11/27/2013 02:35 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Monday 18 November 2013 03:49 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:

>> +static int edma_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	int j, r;
>> +
>> +	r = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>> +	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(r)) {
> 
> So IS_ERR_VALUE() is only for functions which may return a negative
> number outside of MAX_ERRNO as a success indication.
> pm_runtime_get_sync() does not appear to be one of them so just use"
>
> if (r < 0) { .. }

That's true. Thanks for catching this, I'll fix it. However, grepping
through the tree, there are quite a lot places where the same mistake is
made.

>> +		/* Map the channel to param entry if channel mapping logic
>> +		 * exist
>> +		 */
> 
> Please follow the multi-line commenting style.

Can do. However, these lines in fact follow the style that is used
throughout the entire file ;)

> There are some checkpatch checks that result from lines like this.
> Please fix these as well.
> 
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> #179: FILE: arch/arm/common/edma.c:1841:
> +			map_queue_tc(j, queue_tc_mapping[i][0],
> +					queue_tc_mapping[i][1]);

If you say so, even though I disagree with checkpatch.pl here. The above
is actually more readable, right? :)

Thanks,
Daniel