Subject: [PATCH v2 00/10] Reuse davinci-nand driver for Keystone arch

From: [email-masked] (ivan.khoronzhuk)
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 11:45:16 +0200

On 11/29/2013 06:28 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Ivan,
> On Thursday 21 November 2013 06:28 AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
>> This series contains fixes and updates of Davinci nand driver in
>> order to reuse it for Keystone platform.
>>
>> The series is combination of two following series:
>> - Davinci nand driver fixes and updates:
>>    https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/271
>> - Reuse davinci-nand driver for Keystone arch
>>    https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/315
>>
>> Ivan Khoronzhuk (10):
>>    mtd: nand: davinci: fix driver registration
>>    mtd: nand: davinci: return ENOMEM if memory allocation is failed
>>    mtd: nand: davinci: check required ti,davinci-chipselect property
>>    mtd: nand: davinci: simplify error handling
>>    mtd: nand: davinci: move bindings under mtd
>>    mtd: nand: davinci: extend description of bindings
>>    mtd: nand: davinci: adjust DT properties to MTD generic
>>    mtd: nand: davinci: reuse driver for Keystone arch
>>    mtd: nand: davinci: don't set timings if AEMIF is used
>>    mtd: nand: davinci: don't request AEMIF address range
>>
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/davinci/nand.txt       |   46 --------
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/davinci-nand.txt       |   94 ++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig                           |    6 +-
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c                    |  117 +++++++++++---------
>>   4 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
>>   delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/davinci/nand.txt
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/davinci-nand.txt
>>
> Please drop patch 9 from the series considering we are handling it
> differently and repost the entire series with David in cc. David
> has been lining up the patches.
> 
> Regards,
> Santosh
> 

Ok, I'll drop patch 9.
Only question about patch
ARM: davinci: aemif: get rid of davinci-nand driver dependency on aemif
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg13711.html).
How would be better, the series would be based on it or vice-versa?

-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk