Subject: [PATCH 18/31] ASoC: tegra: allocate AHUB FIFO during probe() not startup()

From: [email-masked] (Stephen Warren)
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 12:55:55 -0700

On 11/29/2013 07:40 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:54:13PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> Teh Tegra30 I2S driver currently allocates DMA FIFOs from the
>> AHUB only when an audio stream starts playback. This is
>> theoretically nice for resource sharing, but makes no practical
>> difference for any configuration the drivers currently support.
>> However, this deferral prevents conversion to the standard DMA DT
>> bindings, since conversion requires knowledge of the specific DMA
>> channel to be allocated, which in turn depends on which specific
>> FIFO was allocated.
>> 
>> For this reason, move the FIFO allocate into probe() to allow
>> later
...
>> +	i2s->playback_dma_data.addr_width =
>> DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES; +	i2s->playback_dma_data.maxburst =
>> 4; +	ret =
>> tegra30_ahub_allocate_tx_fifo(&i2s->playback_fifo_cif, +
>> &i2s->playback_dma_data.addr, +
>> &i2s->playback_dma_data.slave_id); +	if (ret) { +
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not alloc TX FIFO: %d\n", ret); +
>> goto err_suspend; +	} +	ret =
>> tegra30_ahub_set_rx_cif_source(i2s->playback_i2s_cif, +
>> i2s->playback_fifo_cif); +	if (ret) { +		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> "Could not route TX FIFO: %d\n", ret); +		goto err_free_tx_fifo; 
>> +	} + +	i2s->capture_dma_data.addr_width =
>> DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES; +	i2s->capture_dma_data.maxburst =
>> 4; +	ret = tegra30_ahub_allocate_rx_fifo(&i2s->capture_fifo_cif, 
>> +					    &i2s->capture_dma_data.addr, +
>> &i2s->capture_dma_data.slave_id); +	if (ret) { +
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not alloc RX FIFO: %d\n", ret); +
>> goto err_unroute_tx_fifo; +	} +	ret =
>> tegra30_ahub_set_rx_cif_source(i2s->capture_fifo_cif, +
>> i2s->capture_i2s_cif); +	if (ret) { +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could
>> not route TX FIFO: %d\n", ret); +		goto err_free_rx_fifo; +	} +
> 
> It could be useful to have these in a separate function so as not
> to make the .probe() any larger. It's already pretty big as it is.

May I ignore this; I personally prefer larger linear functions; it's
much easier to follow the code-flow without having to jump back/forth
between a bunch of single-use functions.