Subject: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep

From: [email-masked] (John Stultz)
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:28:31 -0800

On 01/02/2014 04:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Stultz <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead
>> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep
>> enabled seqcount methods.
>>
>> This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations
>> as well, which will be utilized in a following patch.
> Ack on this and on 2/2. I'm assuming I'll get them through the -tip
> tree, which is where the problem came from. No?

It seems Peter or Ingo are still on holiday. Hopefully they will be back
on Monday to queue these.

thanks
-john