Subject: [PATCH 3/8] ARM: at91: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

From: [email-masked] (Nicolas Ferre)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:46:28 +0100

On 11/02/2014 17:24, Josh Cartwright :
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> While we're here, mark the rtsc id table const.

Well, I might remove this one, just because other id tables are not
marked as "const" in the same file... So it can be good to change all of
them in a raw.

> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 16 ++++------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> index f7ca97b..e884de8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ void __init at91_ioremap_matrix(u32 base_addr)
>  }
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> -static struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
> +static const struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-rstc", .data = at91sam9_alt_restart },
>  	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-rstc", .data = at91sam9g45_restart },
>  	{ /*sentinel*/ }
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>  
> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, rstc_ids);
> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, rstc_ids, &of_id);
>  	if (!np)
>  		panic("unable to find compatible rstc node in dtb\n");
>  
> @@ -371,10 +371,6 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
>  	if (!at91_rstc_base)
>  		panic("unable to map rstc cpu registers\n");
>  
> -	of_id = of_match_node(rstc_ids, np);
> -	if (!of_id)
> -		panic("AT91: rtsc no restart function available\n");
> -
>  	arm_pm_restart = of_id->data;
>  
>  	of_node_put(np);
> @@ -392,7 +388,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>  
> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, ramc_ids);
> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, ramc_ids, &of_id);
>  	if (!np)
>  		panic("unable to find compatible ram controller node in dtb\n");
>  
> @@ -402,11 +398,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
>  	/* the controller may have 2 banks */
>  	at91_ramc_base[1] = of_iomap(np, 1);
>  
> -	of_id = of_match_node(ramc_ids, np);
> -	if (!of_id)
> -		pr_warn("AT91: ramc no standby function available\n");
> -	else
> -		at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);
> +	at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);

Even if it changes the strict behavior of the function, I do not see any
advantage in keeping the pr_warn() path instead of a simple panic()
protecting the "find" and "match" together...

So, without the "const" modification, it ends up with a:

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email-masked]>

=> if you want, I can take the patch with me through arm-soc with at91
material for 3.15 and complete your "const" modification. What do you
think about that?

>  	of_node_put(np);
>  }

Thanks for having taking care of this file, bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre