From: grygorii.strashko@ti•com (Grygorii Strashko)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone soc
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:00:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FBB6BC.2060801@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbrs==tpUBs=WLWkt0frBcSMRDRokOn2tvP-1gt7Qq3+w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Linus,
On 02/12/2014 05:03 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Grygorii Strashko
> <grygorii.strashko@ti•com> wrote:
>
>> The similar GPIO HW block is used by keystone SoCs as
>> in Davinci SoCs.
>> Hence, reuse Davinci GPIO driver for Keystone taking into
>> account that Keystone contains ARM GIC IRQ controller which
>> is implemented using IRQ Chip.
>>
>> Documentation:
>> http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf
>>
>> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti•com>
>> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro•org>
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti•com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v4:
>> - rebased on top of v3.14 +
>> [patch] gpio: davinci: signedness bug in davinci_gpio_irq_setup()
>
> I tried applying this and it does not apply on the "devel" branch
> in the GPIO tree. Since I haven't touched one line of code in the
> DaVinci driver since v3.14-rc1 I seriously doubt that this is
> rebased on v3.14[-rc].
>
> Can you please rebase the patch onto v3.14-rc1 for real and
> resend it?
Sorry, But I've to clarify that this patch is based on:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-kernel-janitors/msg18017.html
[patch] gpio: davinci: signedness bug in davinci_gpio_irq_setup()
And I did it to avoid merge conflicts between these two patches.
Is it possible to apply above one first? It's not in any of your
branches.
Of Course, I can re-base this patch on clean v3.14-rc1, but then merge
conflict will happen with "gpio: davinci: signedness.." patch.
Regards,
- grygorii
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-12 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-05 15:47 [PATCH v4] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone soc Grygorii Strashko
2014-02-06 13:20 ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-07 13:25 ` Sekhar Nori
2014-02-12 15:03 ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-12 18:00 ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2014-02-13 15:58 ` [RESEND][PATCH " Grygorii Strashko
2014-02-21 14:18 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-02-25 11:52 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-03-04 9:20 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-04 11:28 ` Grygorii Strashko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52FBB6BC.2060801@ti.com \
--to=grygorii.strashko@ti$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox