Subject: [PATCH v2 10/14] dma: edma: Simplify direction configuration in edma_config_pset()

From: [email-masked] (Joel Fernandes)
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:40:05 -0500

On 04/01/2014 08:06 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> We only support DEV_TO_MEM or MEM_TO_DEV directions with edma driver and the
> check for the direction has been already done in the function calling
> edma_config_pset().
> The error reporting is redundant and also the "else if ()" can be removed.
> 

NAK. Please don't do this. I have been working on MEM_TO_MEM support as
well so leave it as it is for future.

Thanks,
-Joel

> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/edma.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
> index 855766672aa9..d954099650ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
> @@ -372,14 +372,12 @@ static int edma_config_pset(struct dma_chan *chan, struct edmacc_param *pset,
>  		src_cidx = cidx;
>  		dst_bidx = 0;
>  		dst_cidx = 0;
> -	} else if (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM)  {
> +	} else {
> +		/* DMA_DEV_TO_MEM */
>  		src_bidx = 0;
>  		src_cidx = 0;
>  		dst_bidx = acnt;
>  		dst_cidx = cidx;
> -	} else {
> -		dev_err(dev, "%s: direction not implemented yet\n", __func__);
> -		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
>  	pset->opt = EDMA_TCC(EDMA_CHAN_SLOT(echan->ch_num));
>