Subject: [PATCHv2 07/11] ARM: OMAP3: Beagle: use PWM_LOOKUP to initialize struct pwm_lookup

From: [email-masked] (Peter Ujfalusi)
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:01:44 +0300

On 04/15/2014 12:59 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c | 10 ++--------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
> index f27e1ec90b5e..54c135a5b4f7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
> @@ -61,14 +61,8 @@
>  
>  static struct pwm_lookup pwm_lookup[] = {
>  	/* LEDB -> PMU_STAT */
> -	{
> -		.provider = "twl-pwmled",
> -		.index = 1,
> -		.dev_id = "leds_pwm",
> -		.con_id = "beagleboard::pmu_stat",
> -		.period = 7812500,
> -		.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL,
> -	},
> +	PWM_LOOKUP("twl-pwmled", 1, "leds_pwm", "beagleboard::pmu_stat",
> +		   7812500, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL),

Why do you need to do this in two steps?
In patch 4 you removed the existing PWM_LOOKUP() and now you are adding it back.
Would not be simpler if you just add the two new parameters in patch 4 (the
812500, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)?

>  };
>  
>  static struct led_pwm pwm_leds[] = {
> 

-- 
P?ter