Subject: [PATCH] arm: dts: am43x-clock: add tbclk data for ehrpwm.

From: [email-masked] (Tero Kristo)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:41:24 +0300

On 04/22/2014 01:25 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> We need "tblclk" clock data for the functioning of ehrpwm
> module. Hence, populating the required clock information
> in clock dts file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <[email-masked]>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi |   84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c            |    6 +++
>   2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
> index 142009c..869f9a5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
> @@ -87,6 +87,90 @@
>   		clock-mult = <1>;
>   		clock-div = <1>;
>   	};
> +
> +	ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk {
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
> +		clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
> +		ti,bit-shift = <0>;
> +		reg = <0x0664>;
> +	};
> +
> +	ehrpwm0_tbclk: ehrpwm0_tbclk {
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
> +		clocks = <&ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk>;
> +	};

Why do you use composite-clock type here? I see only add one sub-clock 
to the composite, thus the composite part is unused. How about using a 
gate-clock type only? Same question applies for the rest of the patch also.

-Tero

> +
> +	ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk {
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
> +		clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
> +		ti,bit-shift = <1>;
> +		reg = <0x0664>;
> +	};
> +
> +	ehrpwm1_tbclk: ehrpwm1_tbclk {
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
> +		clocks = <&ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk>;
> +	};
> +
> +	ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk {
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
> +		clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
> +		ti,bit-shift = <2>;
> +		reg = <0x0664>;
> +	};
> +
> +	ehrpwm2_tbclk: ehrpwm2_tbclk {
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
> +		clocks = <&ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk>;
> +	};
> +
> +	ehrpwm3_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm3_gate_tbclk {
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
> +		clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
> +		ti,bit-shift = <2>;
> +		reg = <0x0664>;
> +	};
> +
> +	ehrpwm3_tbclk: ehrpwm3_tbclk {
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
> +		clocks = <&ehrpwm3_gate_tbclk>;
> +	};
> +
> +	ehrpwm4_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm4_gate_tbclk {
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
> +		clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
> +		ti,bit-shift = <2>;
> +		reg = <0x0664>;
> +	};
> +
> +	ehrpwm4_tbclk: ehrpwm4_tbclk {
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
> +		clocks = <&ehrpwm4_gate_tbclk>;
> +	};
> +
> +	ehrpwm5_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm5_gate_tbclk {
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
> +		clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
> +		ti,bit-shift = <2>;
> +		reg = <0x0664>;
> +	};
> +
> +	ehrpwm5_tbclk: ehrpwm5_tbclk {
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
> +		clocks = <&ehrpwm5_gate_tbclk>;
> +	};
>   };
>   &prcm_clocks {
>   	clk_32768_ck: clk_32768_ck {
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c
> index 67c8de5..5413a6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c
> @@ -105,6 +105,12 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk am43xx_clks[] = {
>   	DT_CLK(NULL, "func_12m_clk", "func_12m_clk"),
>   	DT_CLK(NULL, "vtp_clk_div", "vtp_clk_div"),
>   	DT_CLK(NULL, "usbphy_32khz_clkmux", "usbphy_32khz_clkmux"),
> +	DT_CLK("48300200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm0_tbclk"),
> +	DT_CLK("48302200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm1_tbclk"),
> +	DT_CLK("48304200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm2_tbclk"),
> +	DT_CLK("48306200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm0_tbclk"),
> +	DT_CLK("48308200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm1_tbclk"),
> +	DT_CLK("4830a200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm2_tbclk"),
>   	{ .node_name = NULL },
>   };
>
>