Subject: [PATCHv4 3/7] ARM: EXYNOS: Support secondary CPU boot of Exynos3250

From: [email-masked] (Chanwoo Choi)
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:43:17 +0900

Hi,

On 04/25/2014 01:30 PM, Tushar Behera wrote:
> On 04/25/2014 06:46 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch fix the offset of CPU boot address and don't need to send smc call
>> of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command for secondary CPU boot because Exynos3250 removes
>> WFE in secure mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <[email-masked]>
>> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <[email-masked]>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 10 ++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
>> index aa01c42..386d01d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
>> @@ -31,11 +31,17 @@ static int exynos_do_idle(void)
>>  static int exynos_cpu_boot(int cpu)
>>  {
>>  	/*
>> +	 * Exynos3250 doesn't need to send smc command for secondary CPU boot
>> +	 * because Exynos3250 removes WFE in secure mode.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (soc_is_exynos3250())
>> +		return 0;
>> +	/*
>>  	 * The second parameter of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command means CPU id.
>>  	 * But, Exynos4212 has only one secondary CPU so second parameter
>>  	 * isn't used for informing secure firmware about CPU id.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (soc_is_exynos4212())
>> +	else if (soc_is_exynos4212())
> 
> This changes is not required.

Do you mean it as following?

	if (soc_is_exynos3250())
		return 0

	if (soc_is_exynos4212())
		cpu = 0;

> 
>>  		cpu = 0;
>>  
>>  	exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT, cpu, 0, 0);
>> @@ -46,7 +52,7 @@ static int exynos_set_cpu_boot_addr(int cpu, unsigned long boot_addr)
>>  {
>>  	void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c;
>>  
>> -	if (!soc_is_exynos4212())
>> +	if (!soc_is_exynos4212() && !soc_is_exynos3250())
>>  		boot_reg += 4*cpu;
>>  
>>  	__raw_writel(boot_addr, boot_reg);
>>
> 
>