public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rnayak@ti•com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: DRA7: Add support for soc_is_dra74x() and soc_is_dra72x() varients
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:49:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <535F8ADF.6090702@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4792826.emf6IohHd6@wuerfel>

On Tuesday 29 April 2014 04:48 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 April 2014 16:35:13 Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> @@ -393,7 +395,12 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430)
>>  
>>  #if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DRA7XX)
>>  #undef soc_is_dra7xx
>> +#undef soc_is_dra74x
>> +#undef soc_is_dra72x
>>  #define soc_is_dra7xx()        (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,dra7"))
>> +#define soc_is_dra74x()        (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,dra74"))
>> +#define soc_is_dra72x()        (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,dra72"))
>> +
> 
> You shouldn't normally have to define these. Why are they needed?
> 
> Maybe it's better to wait for a user to show up, and then we can decide
> whether we actually want to have them this way, or if there is a better
> solution for the particular use case.
> 
> Normally, we'd want to make run-time decisions based on properties
> of the nodes a driver is working on, not the global machine compatible
> string.

Yeah, actually this can be dropped. There is no user for it now.

> 
> 	Arnd
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-29 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-29 11:05 [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: DRA7: Add support for DRA72x devices Rajendra Nayak
2014-04-29 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] ARM: dts: dra7-evm: Remove the wrong and undocumented compatible Rajendra Nayak
2014-04-29 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] ARM: dts: Add support for DRA72x family of devices Rajendra Nayak
2014-04-29 11:16   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-29 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] ARM: OMAP2+: Replace all __initdata with __initconst for const init Rajendra Nayak
2014-04-29 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] ARM: OMAP2+: Add machine entry for dra72x devices Rajendra Nayak
2014-04-29 11:16   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-29 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: DRA7: Add support for soc_is_dra74x() and soc_is_dra72x() varients Rajendra Nayak
2014-04-29 11:18   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-29 11:19     ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2014-05-06 16:28       ` Tony Lindgren
2014-05-07  4:38         ` Rajendra Nayak
2014-05-06  5:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: DRA7: Add support for DRA72x devices Rajendra Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=535F8ADF.6090702@ti.com \
    --to=rnayak@ti$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox