Subject: [PATCH v4 05/15] clk: exynos5420: update clocks for G2D and G3D blocks

From: [email-masked] (Tomasz Figa)
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 18:50:13 +0200

Hi Shaik,

On 06.05.2014 18:26, Shaik Ameer Basha wrote:
> This patch adds missing clocks of G2D block. It also removes
> the aclkg3d alias from G3D block clocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Shaik Ameer Basha <[email-masked]>
> ---
>   drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c   |   17 ++++++++++++++---
>   include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h |    2 ++
>   2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> index 320f72d..5bc4798 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>   #define DIV_CPU1		0x504
>   #define GATE_BUS_CPU		0x700
>   #define GATE_SCLK_CPU		0x800
> +#define GATE_IP_G2D		0x8800
>   #define CPLL_LOCK		0x10020
>   #define DPLL_LOCK		0x10030
>   #define EPLL_LOCK		0x10040
> @@ -402,8 +403,8 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5420_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
>   			8, 1),
>   	MUX(0, "mout_user_aclk266_g2d", mout_user_aclk266_g2d_p, SRC_TOP5,
>   			12, 1),
> -	MUX_A(CLK_MOUT_G3D, "mout_user_aclk_g3d", mout_user_aclk_g3d_p,
> -			SRC_TOP5, 16, 1, "aclkg3d"),
> +	MUX(CLK_MOUT_G3D, "mout_user_aclk_g3d", mout_user_aclk_g3d_p,
> +			SRC_TOP5, 16, 1),
>   	MUX(0, "mout_user_aclk300_jpeg", mout_user_aclk300_jpeg_p,
>   			SRC_TOP5, 20, 1),
>   	MUX(0, "mout_user_aclk300_disp1", mout_user_aclk300_disp1_p,
> @@ -830,6 +831,16 @@ static struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5420_gate_clks[] __initdata = {
>   	GATE(CLK_SMMU_FIMD1, "smmu_fimd1", "aclk300_disp1", GATE_IP_DISP1, 8, 0,
>   		0),
>
> +	/* G2D */
> +	GATE(CLK_MDMA0, "mdma0", "aclk266_g2d",
> +			GATE_IP_G2D, 1, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
> +	GATE(CLK_G2D, "g2d", "aclk333_g2d",
> +			GATE_IP_G2D, 3, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
> +	GATE(CLK_SMMU_MDMA0, "smmu_mdma0", "aclk266_g2d",
> +			GATE_IP_G2D, 5, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
> +	GATE(CLK_SMMU_G2D, "smmu_g2d", "aclk333_g2d",
> +			GATE_IP_G2D, 7, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),

Why they all have CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag set? This isn't very good from 
power management point of view.

Sorry for commenting on this only in this version of the series, but I 
was a bit short of time before. I'll try to review this one thoroughly.

Best regards,
Tomasz