Subject: [PATCHv5 2/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Support secondary CPU boot of Exynos3250

From: [email-masked] (Tomasz Figa)
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 21:32:33 +0200

Hi,

On 13.05.2014 15:05, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch fix the offset of CPU boot address and don't need to send smc call
> of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command for secondary CPU boot because Exynos3250 removes
> WFE in secure mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <[email-masked]>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> index 739bdc8..eb91d23 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,13 @@ static int exynos_do_idle(void)
>  static int exynos_cpu_boot(int cpu)
>  {
>  	/*
> +	 * Exynos3250 doesn't need to send smc command for secondary CPU boot
> +	 * because Exynos3250 removes WFE in secure mode.
> +	 */
> +	if (soc_is_exynos3250())
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/*
>  	 * The second parameter of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command means CPU id.
>  	 * But, Exynos4212 has only one secondary CPU so second parameter
>  	 * isn't used for informing secure firmware about CPU id.
> @@ -50,7 +57,7 @@ static int exynos_set_cpu_boot_addr(int cpu, unsigned long boot_addr)
>  
>  	boot_reg = sysram_ns_base_addr + 0x1c;
>  
> -	if (!soc_is_exynos4212())
> +	if (!soc_is_exynos4212() && !soc_is_exynos3250())
>  		boot_reg += 4*cpu;
>  
>  	__raw_writel(boot_addr, boot_reg);
> 

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <[email-masked]>

Best regards,
Tomasz