Subject: [PATCH 02/11] pinctrl: sunxi: add IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag for pinctrl irq chip

From: [email-masked] (Hans de Goede)
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 11:09:17 +0200

Hi,

On 05/27/2014 10:07 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:47:57AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> From: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email-masked]>
>>
>> The sunxi pinctrl irq chip driver does not support wakeup at the
>> moment. Adding IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE lets the irqs work with drivers
>> using wakeup.
>>
>> Also add a name to the irq chip.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email-masked]>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email-masked]>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
>> index db9ccd6..ec60c2e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
>> @@ -646,6 +646,8 @@ static struct irq_chip sunxi_pinctrl_irq_chip = {
>>  	.irq_mask_ack	= sunxi_pinctrl_irq_mask_ack,
>>  	.irq_unmask	= sunxi_pinctrl_irq_unmask,
>>  	.irq_set_type	= sunxi_pinctrl_irq_set_type,
>> +	.name		= "sunxi-pio",
>> +	.flags		= IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
> 
> I'd rather see the name set to dev_name() or something like that. This
> will not work that great with multiple pin controller supporting
> interrupts.

That would require moving the irq_chip struct to become a member of the
sunxi_pinctrl struct. Not undoable, but that seems like something which
should be done in a separate patch. So shall I just drop the .name part
of this patch for now ?

Regards,

Hans