public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: swarren@wwwdotorg•org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/4] memory: tegra124-emc: Add EMC driver
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:15:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A069B6.6070902@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A03186.3040703@collabora.com>

On 06/17/2014 06:16 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 06/16/2014 10:02 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/16/2014 07:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:

>> This binding looks quite anaemic vs.
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-emc.txt; I
>> would expect that this binding needs all the EMC register data from the
>> tegra20-emc binding too. Can the two bindings be identical?
> 
> There's even less stuff needed right now, as all what ultimately the EMC
> driver does is call clk_set_rate on the EMC clock. As the T124 EMC
> driver gains more features, they should get more similar.

IIRC, even changing the EMC clock rate requires modifying the memory
controller's programming (e.g. delays/taps/tuning etc.). That's exactly
what the more complex stuff in the nvidia,tegra20-emc.txt is all about.
I not convinced that a driver that just modifies the clock rate without
adjusting the EMC programming will work reliably.

>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA124_EMC
>>> +int tegra124_emc_reserve_bandwidth(unsigned int consumer, unsigned
>>> long rate);
>>> +void tegra124_emc_set_floor(unsigned long freq);
>>> +void tegra124_emc_set_ceiling(unsigned long freq);
>>> +#else
>>> +int tegra124_emc_reserve_bandwidth(unsigned int consumer, unsigned
>>> long rate)
>>> +{ return -ENODEV; }
>>> +void tegra124_emc_set_floor(unsigned long freq)
>>> +{ return; }
>>> +void tegra124_emc_set_ceiling(unsigned long freq)
>>> +{ return; }
>>> +#endif
>>
>> I'll repeat what I said off-list so that we can have the whole
>> conversation on the list:
>>
>> That looks like a custom Tegra-specific API. I think it'd be much better
>> to integrate this into the common clock framework as a standard clock
>> constraints API. There are other use-cases for clock constraints besides
>> EMC scaling (e.g. some in audio on Tegra, and I'm sure many on other
>> SoCs too).
> 
> Yes, I wrote a bit in the cover letter about our requirements and how
> they map to the CCF. Could you please comment on that?

My comments remain the same. I believe this is something that belongs in
the clock driver, or at the least, some API that takes a struct clock as
its parameter, so that drivers can use the existing DT clock lookup
mechanism.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-17 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-16 13:35 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Tegra124: EMC scaling Tomeu Vizoso
2014-06-16 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] memory: tegra124-emc: Add EMC driver Tomeu Vizoso
2014-06-16 14:03   ` Mikko Perttunen
2014-06-16 20:02   ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-17 12:16     ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-06-17 16:15       ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2014-06-17 16:59         ` Mikko Perttunen
2014-06-18 17:23         ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-06-18 17:46           ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-18 22:03             ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-18 22:09               ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-18 23:14                 ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-18 23:24                   ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-18 22:00           ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-18 22:19             ` Stéphane Marchesin
2014-06-18 22:33               ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-18 23:20                 ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-17 22:35       ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-18  8:57         ` Peter De Schrijver
2014-06-16 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] ARM: tegra: Add Tegra124 EMC support Tomeu Vizoso
2014-06-17 22:38   ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-16 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] drm/tegra: Request memory bandwidth for the display controller Tomeu Vizoso
2014-06-16 20:06   ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-17 22:43     ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-16 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: tegra: Register a minimum EMC frequency based on the CPU clock Tomeu Vizoso
2014-06-16 14:08   ` Mikko Perttunen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53A069B6.6070902@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox