Subject: [PATCH 6/9] ARM: dts: sun7i: Add board support for LinkSprite pcDuino V3

From: [email-masked] (Hans de Goede)
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 09:12:32 +0200

Hi,

On 07/01/2014 04:22 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Hans de Goede <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> From: Zoltan HERPAI <[email-masked]>
>>
>> The LinkSprite pcDuino V3 is an A20 based development board featuring
>> arduino compatible io headers, 1G RAM, 4G nand, sata, rtl8188cus usb wifi
>> and 100 Mbit ethernet using an ip101a phy:
>>
>> http://www.pcduino.com/pcduino-v3/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zoltan HERPAI <[email-masked]>
>> [hdegoede at redhat.com: Various cleanups, correct led pins]
>> [hdegoede at redhat.com: Add axp209, ir and gpio-keys nodes]
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email-masked]>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>>  - update MMC entry to comply with upstream
>>  - unify the 4 patches into one
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>  - fix cosmetic issues
>>  - fix i2c entry
>>  - remove unnecessary input bindings include
>>  - add MMC support
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile               |   3 +-
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-pcduino3.dts | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-pcduino3.dts
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
>> index ed0de8b..fdc590e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
>> @@ -380,7 +380,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN7I) += \
>>         sun7i-a20-cubieboard2.dtb \
>>         sun7i-a20-cubietruck.dtb \
>>         sun7i-a20-i12-tvbox.dtb \
>> -       sun7i-a20-olinuxino-micro.dtb
>> +       sun7i-a20-olinuxino-micro.dtb \
>> +       sun7i-a20-pcduino3.dtb
> 
> You may need to rebase onto my sun8i ippo-q8h dts patch.
> 
>   https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4389951/
> 
> There's a likely conflict in the Makefile here.

Has that one already been accepted by Maxime ? I'm fine rebasing patches
on top of accepted stuff, but rebasing on pending stuff is not really
useful IMHO.

Regards,

Hans