Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: dts: Add exynos5250-spring device tree

From: [email-masked] (Andreas Färber)
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:53:53 +0200

Hi,

Am 31.07.2014 11:49, schrieb Ajay kumar:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Andreas F?rber <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> Am 30.07.2014 15:50, schrieb Andreas F?rber:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..bcca892bf2ff
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts
>> [...]
>>> +&pinctrl_0 {
>>> +     dp_hpd_gpio: dp-hpd-gpio {
>>> +             samsung,pins = "gpc3-0";
>>> +             samsung,pin-function = <1>;
>>
>> Not sure where this 1 came from... Both Ajay and my 3.8 DT have 0.
> Right, this should be 0.
> 
>>> +             samsung,pin-pud = <3>;
>>> +             samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
>>> +     };
>>
>> Seeing that Ajay called this node dp-hdp, it should probably be an override?
> dp_hpd should be enough. I will keep the same name for peach boards.
> dp_hpd: dp-hpd {
> .
> .
> .
> };

Apart from my own set of typos, I see that you proposed dp-hpd whereas
-pinctrl.dtsi has dp_hpd (dash vs. underscore). My question is, can we
override the pinctrl one instead of adding a new one, or do they need to
coexist?

Thanks,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend?rffer; HRB 16746 AG N?rnberg