public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wangyijing@huawei•com (Yijing Wang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 03/11] PCI/MSI: Refactor pci_dev_msi_enabled()
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 09:23:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E183A7.80905@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALRxmdB0Ltt3_G=D4i7x47pHCtCKo8RHgn-hgN+u=px22dimOA@mail.gmail.com>

On 2014/8/6 6:35, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei•com> wrote:
>> Pci_dev_msi_enabled() is used to check whether device
>> MSI/MSIX enabled. Refactor this function  to suuport
>> checking only device MSI or MSIX enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei•com>
> 
> So this patch refactors things so that checks like this:
>    > -       if (!dev->msi_enabled)
> 
> are moved into a function:
>    > +       if (!pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev, MSI_TYPE))
> 
> Can you explain a bit more why this  needed.   Is it just cleanup?

Hi Stuart, it's not just cleanup, because "[RFC PATCH 08/11] PCI/MSI: Introduce new struct msi_irqs and struct msi_ops"
introduced struct msi_irqs, so the code will change to
if (!dev->msi_irqs->msi_enabled)

I think driver should not need to know the details of MSI members.
So I try to rework the pci_dev_msi_enabled() to hide the detailed MSI info.


Thanks!
Yijing.


> 
> .
> 


-- 
Thanks!
Yijing

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-06  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-26  3:08 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] PCI/MSI: Use pci_dev->msi_cap instead of msi_desc->msi_attrib.pos Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] PCI/MSI: Use new MSI type macro instead of PCI MSI flags Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] PCI/MSI: Refactor pci_dev_msi_enabled() Yijing Wang
2014-08-05 22:35   ` Stuart Yoder
2014-08-06  1:23     ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2014-08-20  5:57   ` Bharat.Bhushan at freescale.com
2014-08-20  6:30     ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] PCI/MSI: Move MSIX table address mapping out of msix_capability_init Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] PCI/MSI: Move populate_msi_sysfs() out of msi_capability_init() Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] PCI/MSI: Save MSI irq in PCI MSI layer Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] PCI/MSI: Mask MSI-X entry in msix_setup_entries() Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] PCI/MSI: Introduce new struct msi_irqs and struct msi_ops Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] PCI/MSI: refactor PCI MSI driver Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  6:06   ` Bharat.Bhushan at freescale.com
2014-08-20  6:34     ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] PCI/MSI: Split the generic MSI code into new file Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  6:18   ` Bharat.Bhushan at freescale.com
2014-08-20  6:43     ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] x86/MSI: Refactor x86 MSI code Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  6:20   ` Bharat.Bhushan at freescale.com
2014-08-20  7:01     ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-29 14:08 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-30  2:45   ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  6:47     ` Jiang Liu
2014-07-30  7:20       ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-01 13:16         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-04  3:32           ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 14:45             ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-05  2:20               ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-01 13:52     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-04  6:43       ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 14:59         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-05  2:12           ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-01 10:27 ` arnab.basu at freescale.com
2014-08-04  3:03   ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  5:44     ` Bharat.Bhushan at freescale.com
2014-08-20  6:28       ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  7:41         ` Bharat.Bhushan at freescale.com
2014-08-20  7:55           ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-03  7:15           ` Yijing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E183A7.80905@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyijing@huawei$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox