From: tomeu.vizoso@collabora•com (Tomeu Vizoso)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 3/8] cpufreq: kirkwood: Remove use of the clk provider API
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:53:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F5A587.9030200@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140820225513.5251.284@quantum>
On 08/21/2014 12:55 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2014-08-18 08:30:29)
>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora•com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
>> index 37a4806..f3d087f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>> -#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>> #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
>> #include <linux/of_device.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> @@ -50,7 +49,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table kirkwood_freq_table[] = {
>>
>> static unsigned int kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
>> {
>> - if (__clk_is_enabled(priv.powersave_clk))
>> + if (clk_is_enabled(priv.powersave_clk))
>> return kirkwood_freq_table[1].frequency;
>> return kirkwood_freq_table[0].frequency;
>> }
>> --
>> 1.9.3
>>
>
> Tomeu,
>
> After taking a second look at clk_is_enabled and the Kirkwood driver, I
> would prefer to not implement clk_is_enabled. The main reason is that it
> is racey, since the clock's status could of course change as soon as as
> that call completes. Furthermore I am worried that drivers might do
> something like:
>
> if (!clk_is_enabled(clk))
> clk_enable(clk);
>
> Which is crap and the driver should just call clk_enable any time it
> needs the clock. To that end I propose to drop "clk: provide public
> clk_is_enabled function" and replace your update to kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> with the following patch. Let me know what you think.
Yep, this looks much better to me. I will replace 2/8 and 3/8 with this
one for v8.
Reviewed-By: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora•com>
Thanks!
Tomeu
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>
>
> From 713b46fd66abd26a4e4d584a0b8a2a28c0459a60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro•org>
> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:30:29 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: kirkwood: Remove use of the clk provider API
>
> Instead of checking the clock framework to see if the clock is enabled,
> track the cpu frequency within the driver as the powersave_clk is
> enabled and disabled.
>
> Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora•com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki•net>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro•org>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro•org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> index 37a4806..88f4641 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> -#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -33,6 +32,8 @@ static struct priv
> #define STATE_CPU_FREQ 0x01
> #define STATE_DDR_FREQ 0x02
>
> +static unsigned long cpu_frequency = 0;
> +
> /*
> * Kirkwood can swap the clock to the CPU between two clocks:
> *
> @@ -50,9 +51,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table kirkwood_freq_table[] = {
>
> static unsigned int kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - if (__clk_is_enabled(priv.powersave_clk))
> - return kirkwood_freq_table[1].frequency;
> - return kirkwood_freq_table[0].frequency;
> + return cpu_frequency;
> }
>
> static int kirkwood_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> @@ -71,9 +70,11 @@ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> switch (state) {
> case STATE_CPU_FREQ:
> clk_disable(priv.powersave_clk);
> + cpu_frequency = kirkwood_freq_table[0].frequency;
> break;
> case STATE_DDR_FREQ:
> clk_enable(priv.powersave_clk);
> + cpu_frequency = kirkwood_freq_table[1].frequency;
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -133,6 +134,7 @@ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> clk_prepare_enable(priv.cpu_clk);
> kirkwood_freq_table[0].frequency = clk_get_rate(priv.cpu_clk) / 1000;
> + cpu_frequency = kirkwood_freq_table[0].frequency;
>
> priv.ddr_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "ddrclk");
> if (IS_ERR(priv.ddr_clk)) {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-21 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-18 15:30 [PATCH v7 0/8] Per-user clock constraints Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] clk: Add temporary mapping to the existing API Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-20 14:50 ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-21 18:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-08-21 18:10 ` Jason Cooper
2014-08-22 3:49 ` Simon Horman
2014-08-25 9:18 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] clk: provide public clk_is_enabled function Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] cpufreq: kirkwood: Remove use of the clk provider API Tomeu Vizoso
[not found] ` <20140820225513.5251.284@quantum>
2014-08-21 7:53 ` Tomeu Vizoso [this message]
2014-08-21 13:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-22 19:29 ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-22 20:11 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-22 20:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-26 21:46 ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-26 22:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-26 23:30 ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-27 0:35 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-27 5:04 ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-27 15:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] ASoC: mxs-saif: fix mixed use of public and provider clk API Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] clk: use struct clk only for external API Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] clk: per-user clock accounting for debug Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-27 20:54 ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] clk: Add floor and ceiling constraints to clock rates Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-21 2:12 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] Per-user clock constraints Andrew Lunn
2014-08-21 7:10 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-26 13:20 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53F5A587.9030200@collabora.com \
--to=tomeu.vizoso@collabora$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox