Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] bcma: register bcma as device tree driver

From: [email-masked] (Hauke Mehrtens)
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:52:11 +0200

On 09/18/2014 10:03 PM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> On 16 September 2014 23:56, Hauke Mehrtens <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> +The cores on the AXI bus are auto detected by bcma. bcma automatically
>> +detects the cores
> 
> I'm far from being an English expert, but above is kind of pleonasm to me ;)

Yes to me too. ;-)

>> and the memory ranges they are using and they get
>> +registered afterwards. Automatic detection of the IRQ number is not
>> +possible on BCM47xx/BCM53xx ARM and MIPS SoCs.
> 
> Should we replace "not possible" with something like "not reliable"?
> After the last info we got from Arend.

Yes that sounds good.

> 
> 
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC
>> +/* host_pci.c */
> 
> s/pci/soc/
> 
> 
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> +extern int __init bcma_host_soc_register_driver(void);
>> +extern void __exit bcma_host_soc_unregister_driver(void);
>> +#else
>> +static inline int __init bcma_host_soc_register_driver(void)
>> +{
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +static inline void __exit bcma_host_soc_unregister_driver(void)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC */
> 
> OK, so you just made bcma_host_soc_(un)register_driver calls safe above.
> 
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/main.c b/drivers/bcma/main.c
>> index c421403..e5d578c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bcma/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bcma/main.c
>> @@ -528,6 +528,13 @@ static int __init bcma_modinit(void)
>>         if (err)
>>                 return err;
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC
>> +       err = bcma_host_soc_register_driver();
>> +       if (err) {
>> +               pr_err("SoC host initialization failed\n");
>> +               err = 0;
>> +       }
>> +#endif
> 
> And above you check for CONFIG_ anyway.
> 
Yes that sounds good.