Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: simplefb-sunxi: Add sunxi simplefb extensions

From: [email-masked] (Tomi Valkeinen)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:32:26 +0200

On 18/11/14 13:10, Hans de Goede wrote:
> If pre-filled framebuffer nodes are used, the firmware may need extra
> properties to find the right node. This documents the properties to use
> for this on sunxi platforms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email-masked]>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  .../bindings/video/simple-framebuffer-sunxi.txt    | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer-sunxi.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer-sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer-sunxi.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c46ba64
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer-sunxi.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> +Sunxi specific Simple Framebuffer bindings
> +
> +This binding documents sunxi specific extensions to the simple-framebuffer
> +bindings. The sunxi simplefb u-boot code relies on the devicetree containing
> +pre-populated simplefb nodes.
> +
> +These extensions are intended so that u-boot can select the right node based
> +on which pipeline is being used. As such they are solely intended for
> +firmware / bootloader use, and the OS should ignore them.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: "allwinner,simple-framebuffer"
> +- allwinner,pipeline, one of:

Sorry my ignorance, but what's sunxi and what's allwinner? Both names
are mixed here.

 Tomi

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141125/428e85c9/attachment.sig>