public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: marc.zyngier@arm•com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/16] irqchip: gic: killing gic_arch_extn, slowly
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:59:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <547F2534.6040104@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2236572.MdjJGoEARl@wuerfel>

Hi Arnd,

On 03/12/14 14:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 December 2014 16:58:01 Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>
>> - This actively *breaks* existing setups. Once you boot a new kernel
>>   with an old DT, suspend/resume *will* be broken. Old kernels on a
>>   new DT won't even boot! You've been warned. This really outline the
>>   necessity of actually describing the HW in device trees...
> 
> I wonder if we should take this as the trigger to come up with a
> better way of handling incompatible binding changes. The machine_desc
> has a .dt_fixup callback that we could use to modify the DT passed
> from a boot loader and warn about it, but no platform does this
> at the moment.
> 
> From what I can tell, the required change to get an old dtb working
> with a new kernel is to add a particular node and flip a few
> interrupt-parent properties, which seems doable as a quirk if
> people agree that it's a good idea.

That's probably the only way to avoid the breakage introduced by this
kind of changes. A few questions though:
- Where do we stop? Eventually, don't we end-up with a full DT in there?
- When do we retire such fixup? Or do we keep them forever?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-03 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-02 16:58 [PATCH 00/16] irqchip: gic: killing gic_arch_extn, slowly Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 01/16] ARM: tegra: irq: nuke leftovers from non-DT support Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 02/16] irqchip: tegra: add DT-based support for legacy interrupt controller Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 03/16] ARM: tegra: skip gic_arch_extn setup if DT has a LIC node Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 04/16] ARM: tegra: update DTs to expose legacy interrupt controller Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 05/16] DT: tegra: add binding for the " Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 06/16] ARM: tegra: remove old LIC support Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 07/16] ARM: omap: convert wakeupgen to stacked domains Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 08/16] DT: omap4/5: add binding for the wake-up generator Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 09/16] ARM: imx6: convert wakeupgen to stacked domains Marc Zyngier
2014-12-06 16:08   ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-08 11:18     ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 10/16] ARM: exynos4/5: convert pmu wakeup " Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 11/16] DT: exynos: update PMU binding Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 12/16] irqchip: gic: add an entry point to set up irqchip flags Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 13/16] ARM: shmobile: remove use of gic_arch_extn.irq_set_wake Marc Zyngier
2014-12-04  6:39   ` Simon Horman
2014-12-04  8:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-04 11:46       ` Simon Horman
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 14/16] ARM: ux500: switch from gic_arch_extn to gic_set_irqchip_flags Marc Zyngier
2014-12-03 13:52   ` Linus Walleij
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 15/16] ARM: zynq: " Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 16:58 ` [PATCH 16/16] irqchip: gic: Drop support for gic_arch_extn Marc Zyngier
2014-12-03 14:30 ` [PATCH 00/16] irqchip: gic: killing gic_arch_extn, slowly Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 14:59   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2014-12-03 20:32     ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=547F2534.6040104@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox