Subject: [PATCH v3] ARM: zynq: DT: Add USB to device tree

From: [email-masked] (Andreas Färber)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:19:38 +0100

Hi Michal,

Am 03.12.2014 um 09:39 schrieb Michal Simek:
> On 12/02/2014 05:07 PM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
>> Add USB nodes to zc702, zc706 and zed device trees.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <[email-masked]>
>> ---
>> v3:
>>  - rename phy nodes: usb_phy -> phy0
>>  - rebased onto zynq/dt
>> v2:
>>  - remove '@0' from phy node name
>>  - don't add bogus space
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc702.dts | 11 +++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc706.dts | 10 ++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zed.dts   | 10 ++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
[...]
> Applied to zynq/dt.

Hm, I don't see this patch in linux-next next-20150123...

And if I apply it to my -next based tree, adding corresponding nodes to
zynq-parallella.dts, I get repeatedly:

[  +0,012242] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: no of_node; not parsing pinctrl DT
[  +0,000157] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: ChipIdea HDRC found, lpm: 0; cap:
f090e100 op: f090e140
[  +0,000081] platform ci_hdrc.0: Driver ci_hdrc requests probe deferral
[  +0,005360] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: no of_node; not parsing pinctrl DT
[  +0,000120] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: ChipIdea HDRC found, lpm: 0; cap:
f0910100 op: f0910140
[  +0,001810] platform ci_hdrc.1: Driver ci_hdrc requests probe deferral

Am I missing any other patches or config options?
(I do notice that the pinctrl v3 patch that got merged has a trivial bug
for usb0, for which I'll send a patch later on.)

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)