Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries

From: [email-masked] (Nicolas Ferre)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:45:02 +0100

Le 14/01/2015 10:05, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit :
> On Wednesday 14 January 2015 00:47:59 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>
>> On 13/01/2015 at 15:09:56 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote :
>>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>>> The entries are separated as ARM V4/V5 and ARM V7 as some other per-SoC config
>>>> options may be removed in the near future.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email-masked]>
>>>> ---
>>>> Hi Olof,
>>>>
>>>> This is an attempt to match other ARM SoC families format.
>>>> If you feel that the patch can be good, do not hesitate to take it yourself. I
>>>> don't plan to integrate it in any of my pull-request so it can appear quickly in
>>>> arm-soc and can be used by everyone.
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> If you see what Peter did, he split up the rules per-SoC based on how
>>> things were selectable in Kconfig. Since you seem to have the Kconfig
>>> entries already, how about doing the same? That way the same information
>>> w.r.t. SoC family that you have as comments isn't lost either.
>>>
>>
>> You didn't see the patch set yet because it depends on a lot of other
>> series still being discussed but after the switch to multiplatform, the
>> only config option left will be SOC_AT91RM9200, SOC_AT91SAM9 (both
>> under SOC_SAM_V4_V5) and SOC_SAMA5, under SOC_SAM_V7.
>>
>> That's our plan, unless you feel that we should keep one config option
>> per SoC.
> 
> With the patches that I prepared last year, all of AT91SAM9 becomes
> one small file, so there really isn't any need to have separate Kconfig
> options.

Hi Olof,

After what noted Alexandre and Arnd, don't you think my initial attempt
was okay? Aka: ping ;-)

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre