public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: addy.ke@rock-chips•com (Addy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: fix bug that cause 'Timeout sending command'
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:56:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D85A2F.1090301@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpxYcRu1s8jwtoV5SVCANwX90yEYxED+w45eVuwZJUGEQ@mail.gmail.com>



On 2015.02.09 12:51, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 5 February 2015 at 12:13, Addy Ke <addy.ke@rock-chips•com> wrote:
>> Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
>> DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by card, and mmc controller
>> will be in busy state. This should not happend when mmc controller
>> send command to update card clocks. If this happends, mci_send_cmd will
>> be failed and we will get 'Timeout sending command', and then system will
>> be blocked. To avoid this, we need reset mmc controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Addy Ke <addy.ke@rock-chips•com>
>
> Hi Addy,
>
> Should I consider $subject patch as a better option to the one below?
No:
This patch fix the bug, which can be found by script:
     cd /sys/bus/platform/drivers/dwmmc_rockchip
     for i in $(seq 1 10000); do
       echo "========================" $i
       echo ff0c0000.dwmmc > unbind
       sleep .5
       echo ff0c0000.dwmmc > bind
       sleep 2
     done

> [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: rockchip: Add DW_MCI_QUIRK_RETRY_DELAY
This patch is for tuning issue: we should delay until card go to idle 
state, when the previous command return error.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/13/562
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> index 4d2e3c2..b1d6dfb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ struct idmac_desc {
>>   };
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_MMC_DW_IDMAC */
>>
>> +static int dw_mci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc);
>>   static bool dw_mci_reset(struct dw_mci *host);
>>   static bool dw_mci_ctrl_reset(struct dw_mci *host, u32 reset);
>>
>> @@ -888,6 +889,26 @@ static void mci_send_cmd(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 cmd, u32 arg)
>>                  cmd, arg, cmd_status);
>>   }
>>
>> +static void dw_mci_wait_busy(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
>> +{
>> +       struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
>> +       unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(500);
>> +
>> +       while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
>> +               if (!dw_mci_card_busy(slot->mmc))
>> +                       return;
>> +       }
>> +       dev_err(host->dev, "Data busy (status %#x)\n",
>> +               mci_readl(slot->host, STATUS));
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * Data busy, this should not happend when mmc controller send command
>> +        * to update card clocks in non-volt-switch state. If it happends, we
>> +        * should reset controller to avoid getting "Timeout sending command".
>> +        */
>> +       dw_mci_ctrl_reset(host, SDMMC_CTRL_ALL_RESET_FLAGS);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, bool force_clkinit)
>>   {
>>          struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
>> @@ -899,6 +920,8 @@ static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, bool force_clkinit)
>>          /* We must continue to set bit 28 in CMD until the change is complete */
>>          if (host->state == STATE_WAITING_CMD11_DONE)
>>                  sdmmc_cmd_bits |= SDMMC_CMD_VOLT_SWITCH;
>> +       else
>> +               dw_mci_wait_busy(slot);
>>
>>          if (!clock) {
>>                  mci_writel(host, CLKENA, 0);
>> --
>> 1.8.3.2
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-09  6:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-05 11:13 [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: fix bug that cause 'Timeout sending command' Addy Ke
2015-02-09  4:51 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-02-09  6:56   ` Addy [this message]
2015-02-09  7:04     ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-02-09  9:17       ` addy ke
2015-02-09  7:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] about data busy Addy Ke
2015-02-09  7:25   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: dw_mmc: fix bug that cause 'Timeout sending command' Addy Ke
2015-02-09 10:01     ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-02-11  3:07       ` Addy
2015-02-10 15:22     ` Alim Akhtar
2015-02-11  2:57       ` Addy
2015-02-09  7:25   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: Don't start command while data busy Addy Ke
2015-02-13 11:52   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] about " Addy Ke
2015-02-13 11:52     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mmc: dw_mmc: update clock after host reach a stable voltage Addy Ke
2015-02-13 11:52     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mmc: dw_mmc: fix bug that cause 'Timeout sending command' Addy Ke
2015-02-13 11:52     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mmc: dw_mmc: Don't start command while data busy Addy Ke
2015-02-14  6:17     ` [PATCH v4 0/3] about " Addy Ke
2015-02-14  6:17       ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mmc: dw_mmc: update clock after host reach a stable voltage Addy Ke
2015-02-15 23:28         ` Alim Akhtar
2015-02-19 10:30           ` addy ke
2015-02-19 23:49           ` Doug Anderson
2015-02-20  0:02             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-20  1:04             ` Doug Anderson
2015-02-20 19:05               ` Doug Anderson
2015-02-25  7:52             ` Alim Akhtar
2015-02-25  9:56               ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-02-25 21:05               ` Doug Anderson
2015-02-14  6:17       ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: dw_mmc: fix bug that cause 'Timeout sending command' Addy Ke
2015-02-14  6:17       ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mmc: dw_mmc: Don't start command while data busy Addy Ke
2015-02-20  0:21         ` Doug Anderson
2015-02-15 11:41       ` [PATCH v4 0/3] about " Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-02-16  5:48         ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-02-16 11:09           ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-02-19 10:55         ` addy ke
2015-02-20 19:03       ` Doug Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54D85A2F.1090301@rock-chips.com \
    --to=addy.ke@rock-chips$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox