From: daniel.lezcano@linaro•org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Rename arch_timer_probed to reflect behaviour
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 16:41:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F5D60F.9040602@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F5A165.4010408@arm.com>
On 03/03/2015 12:56 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 01/03/15 13:00, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sunday 25 January 2015 22:52:02 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 01/17/2015 10:46 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>> The arch_timer_probed function returns whether the given time doesn't
>>>> need to be probed. This can be the case when the timer has been probed
>>>> already, but also when it has no corresponding enabled node in DT.
>>>>
>>>> Rename the function to arch_timer_need_probe and invert its return
>>>> value
>>>> to better reflect the function's purpose and behaviour.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
>>>> <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard•com>
>>>
>>> I would like to have an ack from Sudeep or Mark (Cc'ed) before taking
>>> this patch.
>>
>> Sudeep, Mark, ping ?
>>
>
> Looks fine to me. I just wanted to test on KVM which I had broke once
> previously though this change is pretty straight forward and simple.
>
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm•com>
I applied the patch for 4.1.
Thanks !
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-03 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-17 9:46 [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Rename arch_timer_probed to reflect behaviour Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-25 21:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-01 13:00 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-03-03 11:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 11:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-03 11:56 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-03 15:41 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F5D60F.9040602@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox