public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: andre.przywara@arm•com (Andre Przywara)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] amba-pl011: simplify TX handling
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:55:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5508406E.5060607@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150317154248.1675cd4c@north>

[resent with LAKML address fixed]
Hi Jakub,

On 17/03/15 14:42, Jakub Kici?ski wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:58:44 +0000, Dave P Martin wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:15:29PM +0000, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> From: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp•pl>

[ ... ]
>>
>> My update still keeps the softirq stuff.  I wanted to avoid adding
>> status polling inside the interrupt handler's core loop, due to
>> concerns about performance overhead: without the polling, the
>> writes to DR are fire-and-forget, whereas polling FR each time
>> involves a whole round-trip to the UART which may involve significant
>> extra time cost and/or IRQ disable latency; however.
>>
>> Your approach does mitigate some of the cost by only starting to
>> poll after count chars have been transmitted, and will typically
>> halve the number of IRQs taken -- which could lead to a net benefit.
>> It would be good to see some benchmarks to understand how much
>> difference it makes to performance.
> 
> I will *try* to come up with some figures but I don't have any
> high-speed UARTs so my tests run at 115k tops.

Have you tried this?
http://fw.hardijzer.nl/?p=138

This drives the RPi PL011 from a higher frequency clock, thus you can
achieve much higher baud rates. Haven't tried this myself, but it looks
reasonable and not too complicated. You need a matching speed at the
other end, of course, AFAIK the FTDI USB chip can do this.

Cheers,
Andre.

       reply	other threads:[~2015-03-17 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1426547729-21255-1-git-send-email-moorray3@wp.pl>
     [not found] ` <20150317135844.GA3759@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
     [not found]   ` <20150317154248.1675cd4c@north>
2015-03-17 14:55     ` Andre Przywara [this message]
     [not found] <20150317163200.GE3759@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
2015-03-17 23:42 ` [PATCH] amba-pl011: simplify TX handling Jakub Kiciński
2015-03-18 17:41   ` Dave P Martin
2015-03-18 20:26     ` Jakub Kiciński
2015-03-18 23:43     ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5508406E.5060607@arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox