From: guohanjun@huawei•com (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [update][PATCH v10 06/21] ACPI / sleep: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:56:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5508DB5B.2060600@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16235723.xVJ1Rfp9tM@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 2015/3/17 22:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:10:02 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>> On 2015/3/17 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:08:45 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>>>> On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>>>> On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2015?03?14? 05:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>>>>>>>>>> index 074e52b..e8728d7 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config IA64
>>>>>>>>>> select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_SERIO
>>>>>>>>>> select PCI if (!IA64_HP_SIM)
>>>>>>>>>> select ACPI if (!IA64_HP_SIM)
>>>>>>>>>> + select ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP if ACPI
>>>>>>>>>> select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC if ACPI
>>>>>>>>>> select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
>>>>>>>>>> select HAVE_IDE
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>>>>>>>> index b7d31ca..9804431 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ config X86_64
>>>>>>>>>> ### Arch settings
>>>>>>>>>> config X86
>>>>>>>>>> def_bool y
>>>>>>>>>> + select ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP if ACPI
>>>>>>>>> One more nit. If you did
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> + select ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP if ACPI_SLEEP
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> here (and above for ia64), you'd avoid having to make ACPI_SLEEP
>>>>>>>>> depend on ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP which goes somewhat backwards.
>>>>>>>> In sleep.c,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
>>>>>>>> acpi_target_system_state()
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP depends on SUSPEND || HIBERNATION,
>>>>>>>> which one of them will be enabled on ARM64 so ACPI_SLEEP
>>>>>>>> will also enabled too.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So if we
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +select ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP if ACPI_SLEEP
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP) += sleep.o
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it will lead to errors for acpi_target_system_state() that
>>>>>>>> is declared but not defined, so I will keep the code as
>>>>>>>> it is, what do you think?
>>>>>>> No, we need to hash this out. Having two different Kconfig options meaning
>>>>>>> almost the same thing (ACPI_SLEEP and ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP) is beyond ugly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you need ACPI_SLEEP on ARM64 at all?
>>>>>> No, at least for now we don't need it, the spec for sleep is not ready for
>>>>>> ARM64 arch, so ACPI_SLEEP will not work at all on ARM64.
>>>>> Well, so what about selecting ACPI_SLEEP from the architectures that use it?
>>>> Do you mean remove CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP and
>>>>
>>>> +acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) += sleep.o
>>>>
>>>> as well (also need to remove duplicate #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP in sleep.c if
>>>> we doing so)?
>>> Well, almost. There is one problem with that, becuase sleep.c contains code
>>> outside of the ACPI_SLEEP-dependent blocks. That code is used for powering
>>> off ACPI platforms.
>>>
>>> I guess you don't want that code on ARM too, right?
>> Yes, you are right.
>>
>>> Perhaps we can use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY for that? ARM64 will be the
>> Sorry, I can't fully understand your intention here, could you please
>> explain it more?
>>
>> Let me guess a little bit. Do you mean use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY for
>> powering off ACPI platforms? if so, I guess it's not a good idea, ACPI spec
>> only says that S4BIOS is not supported on HW-reduced ACPI platforms, S5
>> has no such limitation, if I miss something here, please let me know.
> OK, so in your current patch, please replace ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP with
> ACPI_SYSTEM_POWER_STATES_SUPPORT and all should be clear.
OK, I will send a updated patch.
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-18 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 8:14 [update][PATCH v10 06/21] ACPI / sleep: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP Hanjun Guo
2015-03-13 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-16 12:14 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-16 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 1:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 2:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 2:36 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 3:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 4:10 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 5:59 ` Jon Masters
2015-03-17 6:31 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 14:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-18 1:56 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-03-17 12:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-17 14:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5508DB5B.2060600@huawei.com \
--to=guohanjun@huawei$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox