public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: swarren@wwwdotorg•org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: brcm: rationalize Broadcom documentation naming
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:03:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5509F61E.5000702@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5509F3CC.1010207@broadcom.com>

On 03/18/2015 03:53 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 15-03-18 12:42 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 03/18/2015 01:24 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
>>> This patchset attempts to standarize the naming of dt-bindings
>>> documents based on the Broadcom vendor prefix of brcm.
>>>
>>> Although there are no guidelines currently present for how to name
>>> the dt-bindings document the "vendor,binding.txt" style is in use by
>>> some of the other vendors.
>>
>> Conceptually I'm fine with this.
>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg•org>
>>
>> The only comment I have is that some bindings refer to other bindings,
>> e.g. an I2C controller binding might refer to the core I2C binding to
>> define core I2C properties. Since this patch moves a couple files
>> between directories, did you double-check that none of the pathnames in
>> those references need fixing up?
>
> Yes, I read all the brcm documents and did not find references to the
> moved files.

Oh, I meant references *from* the moved files to other files.

BTW, I just noticed that both your patches don't have signed-off-by lines.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-18 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-18 19:24 [PATCH] dt-bindings: brcm: rationalize Broadcom documentation naming Scott Branden
2015-03-18 19:42 ` Stephen Warren
2015-03-18 21:53   ` Scott Branden
2015-03-18 22:03     ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2015-03-18 22:08       ` Scott Branden

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5509F61E.5000702@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox