public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: swarren@wwwdotorg•org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:49:02 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <550AFDFE.8040005@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150319160208.GF7657@katana>

On 03/19/2015 10:02 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> -	/* Only register child devices if the adapter has a node pointer set */
>>> -	if (!adap->dev.of_node)
>>> +	/* Only register childs if adapter has a node pointer with enabled status */
>>> +	if (!adap->dev.of_node || !of_device_is_available(adap->dev.of_node))
>>>   		return;
>>
>> That feels a bit odd to me. For a regular non-mux I2C controller, that extra
>> case would never trigger if the controller node was disabled, since the
>> device core would never probe the controller device itself. So, we'd end up
>> with inconsistent paths through the I2C core for regular controllers and
>> muxes.
>
> I first thought the no-op for the non-mux case wouldn't hurt, but I
> agree about the consistent code path. I mentioned in my previous mail
> that i2c-mux might be a better place for this...
>
>> Perhaps better would be to have a mux-specific function to iterate over a
>> mux's child nodes and instantiate buses for those. That function would check
>> whether each bus node was disabled or not. That'd isolate the special case
>> into the place where it was relevant.
>
> ... so I wonder what you think about putting the
> of_device_is_available() check into i2c_add_mux_adapter() once the
> reg-property and chan_id have been matched?

I think that looks like a good place, yes.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-19 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-17 18:52 [PATCH 0/8] Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510 Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 1/8] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-17 20:46   ` Stephen Warren
2015-02-17 21:08     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-17 21:15       ` Stephen Warren
2015-02-17 21:19         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-26 21:46   ` Stephen Warren
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 2/8] devicetree: vendor-prefixes: Add CompuLab to known vendors Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-17 19:37   ` Rob Herring
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 3/8] ARM: dts: dove: Fix uart[23] reg property Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-23 14:54   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 4/8] ARM: dts: dove: Always include gpio and interrupt-controller headers Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-23 14:54   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 5/8] ARM: dts: dove: Add node labels for PCIe ports 0 and 1 Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-23 14:55   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 6/8] ARM: dts: dove: Add some more common pinctrl settings Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-23 14:56   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: dts: dove: Add internal i2c multiplexer node Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-23 15:07   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: dts: dove: Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510 Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-26 17:55 ` [PATCH 0/8] " Gregory CLEMENT
2015-02-26 19:39   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-26 20:01     ` Stephen Warren
2015-02-26 20:35       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-27 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-27 12:24   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-02 20:01     ` Stephen Warren
2015-03-04  9:10       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-09 12:21     ` [PATCH v3 " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-10 16:28       ` Stephen Warren
2015-03-16 20:15         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-18 12:30       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-18 13:23         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-18 14:00           ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-18 23:10             ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-19 10:09               ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-19 10:48                 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-19 15:47                 ` Stephen Warren
2015-03-19 16:02                   ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-19 16:49                     ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2015-03-19 20:52                     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-20 10:19                       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-21 21:00                         ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-22 13:03                           ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-23 18:32                             ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-27 21:08                               ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-04-03 18:17                                 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-02-27 12:24   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] devicetree: vendor-prefixes: Add CompuLab to known vendors Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-27 12:24   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: dts: dove: Add internal i2c multiplexer node Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-27 12:24   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: dove: Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510 Sebastian Hesselbarth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=550AFDFE.8040005@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox