Subject: [PATCH v7 6/6] wlcore: remove wl12xx_platform_data

From: [email-masked] (Sekhar Nori)
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:51:42 +0530

On Monday 23 March 2015 01:36 PM, Eliad Peller wrote:
> hi Sekhar,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Sekhar Nori <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> + Ido
>>
>> On Wednesday 18 March 2015 10:08 PM, Eliad Peller wrote:
>>> Now that we have wlcore device-tree bindings in place
>>> (for both wl12xx and wl18xx), remove the legacy
>>> wl12xx_platform_data struct, and move its members
>>> into the platform device data (that is passed to wlcore)
>>>
>>> Davinci 850 is the only platform that still set
>>> the platform data in the legacy way (and doesn't
>>> have DT bindings), so remove the relevant
>>> code/Kconfig option from the board file (as suggested
>>> by Sekhar Nori)
>>>
>>> Since no one currently uses wlcore_spi, simply remove its
>>> platform data support (DT bindings will have to be added
>>> if someone actually needs it)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <[email-masked]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller <[email-masked]>
>>> ---
>>> v7:
>>> * fix spi compilation (Tony)
>>> * remove irq/irq_trigger from wlcore_platdev_data (they are
>>>   being passed separately)
>>>
>>>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig                  |  11 ---
>>>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c        | 113 -------------------------
>>>  drivers/net/wireless/ti/wilink_platform_data.c |  25 ------
>>>  drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl12xx/main.c          |  19 ++---
>>>  drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/boot.c          |   1 -
>>>  drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c          |   4 +-
>>>  drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c          |  76 +++++------------
>>>  drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/spi.c           |   6 +-
>>>  drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore_i.h      |   6 +-
>>>  include/linux/wl12xx.h                         |  25 ------
>>>  10 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 251 deletions(-)
>>
>> The patch looks good to me, but it will be nice to know to which base it
>> applies cleanly. I tried applying to v4.0-rc1 and linux-next and both
>> failed.
>>
> The patchset was rebased on top of v4.0-rc4.
> (Note that you'll have to apply the whole series, as this patch relies
> on some intermediate changes done by the previous patches in the
> patchset)

I was applying the whole series, but over v4.0-rc1 :) Its best to
mention the baseline in cover-letter itself.

The DA850 related changes in the patch look good to me.

Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <[email-masked]>

Thanks,
Sekhar