Subject: [PATCH v8 19/30] powerpc/pci: Use pci_scan_host_bridge() for simplicity

From: [email-masked] (Yijing Wang)
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:20:07 +0800

On 2015/3/26 13:19, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Hi Yijing,
> 
> Pulled.
> 
> I'm now getting build errors:
> 
> /scratch/dja/linux-patches/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c: In function 'pcibios_scan_phb':
> /scratch/dja/linux-patches/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c:1638:14: error: 'bus' undeclared (first use in this function)
> /scratch/dja/linux-patches/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c:1638:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 
> That relates to your changes to pcibios_scan_phb:
> -       struct pci_bus *bus;
> +       struct pci_host_bridge *host;
> clashing with line 1638:
> 	hose->bus = bus;
> which occurs later in the same unction.
> 
> If I fix that, I'll get more errors with lines in that function that
> still reference hose instead of host.
> 
> As well as line 1638, there's still big chunks of the function that
> reference hose, for example:
> 
> 	/* Get some IO space for the new PHB */
> 	pcibios_setup_phb_io_space(hose);
> 
> 	/* Wire up PHB bus resources */
> 	pcibios_setup_phb_resources(hose, &resources);
> 
> 	hose->busn.start = hose->first_busno;
> 	hose->busn.end	 = hose->last_busno;
> 	hose->busn.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> 	pci_add_resource(&resources, &hose->busn);
> 
> 	pci_host_ops.pci_ops = hose->ops;
> 
> 
> Basically, the changes in PowerPC need to be quite a bit more through
> just to get the changes to build.
> 
> I'm keen to work on simplifying PCI code in PowerPC, but at this point,
> it will need a lot more work before it's ready to go in.

Hi Daniel, I'm really so sorry about that, I will update it today.

Thanks!
Yijing.

> 
> Regards,
> Daniel
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 09:17 +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> On 2015/3/26 6:13, Daniel Axtens wrote:
>>> Hi Yijing,
>>>
>>> I wasn't quite sure I understood your comments, so I was trying to apply
>>> your patch series and test it, but patch 3 doesn't apply cleanly to
>>> 4.0-rc5 or master. Can you respin the series?
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>    Could you pull the series from Bjorn's git tree ? The URL is
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git pci/enumeration-yw8
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Yijing.
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Daniel, thanks for your review and comments. We want to make a generic pci_host_bridge,
>>>> which would hold the common host information, for example, pci domain is common info for
>>>> pci host bridge, this series saved domain in pci_host_bridge, then we no need to
>>>> extract out domain by pci_bus->sysdata by platform specific pci_domain_nr().
>>>> Also we store the sysdata in pci_host_bridge, and pci_bus_to_host() is the platform
>>>> interface, I think use the common interface would be better.
>>>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	/* Get probe mode and perform scan */
>>>>>> +	if (hose->dn && ppc_md.pci_probe_mode)
>>>>>> +		mode = ppc_md.pci_probe_mode(bus);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	pr_debug("    probe mode: %d\n", mode);
>>>>>> +	if (mode == PCI_PROBE_DEVTREE)
>>>>>> +		of_scan_bus(hose->dn, bus);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	if (mode == PCI_PROBE_NORMAL) {
>>>>>> +		pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(bus, 255);
>>>>>> +		hose->last_busno = pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>>>>>> +		pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(bus, hose->last_busno);
>>>>>> +	}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	return pci_bus_child_max_busnr(bus);
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>> I'm having trouble convincing myself that this patch covers every
>>>>> variation within our PCI implementations. In particular, there's a
>>>>> stanza in of_scan_pci_bridge in kernel/pci_of_scan.c that's almost
>>>>> identical to this function. Does that implementation need to be cleaned
>>>>> up and replaced with this function too?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is a pci_host_bridge_ops hook function, which would be called in
>>>> PCI core, and after applied this series, we only need to call pci_scan_host_bridge()
>>>> to scan pci devices, and this function is also extracted from the pcibios_scan_phb(),
>>>> it's not the redundant code.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -1641,9 +1655,9 @@ void pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller *hose)
>>>>>>  		ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_phb(hose);
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  	/* Configure PCI Express settings */
>>>>>> -	if (bus && !pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
>>>>>> +	if (host->bus && !pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
>>>>>>  		struct pci_bus *child;
>>>>>> -		list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
>>>>>> +		list_for_each_entry(child, &host->bus->children, node)
>>>>>>  			pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>  }
>>>>> Two things: Firstly, the function uses hose throughout, not host.
>>>>> Secondly, you're not deleting the bus variable: what's the purpose of
>>>>> this change?
>>>>
>>>> host is the common pci_host_bridge which is created by PCI core for pci host bridge driver,
>>>> the hose is the platform data used in powerpc. The purpose of the patch/series is to simplify
>>>> pci enumeration interface, and try to reduce the weak functions which were used to setup pci bus/devices
>>>> during PCI enumeration.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 

-- 
Thanks!
Yijing