Subject: [PATCH 3/4] clk: si5351: Do not pass struct clk in platform_data

From: [email-masked] (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 22:46:15 +0200

On 30.04.2015 21:16, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth
> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> Michael is right, the check is for bailing out if none of the parent
>> clocks is available.
>
> +       if (IS_ERR(drvdata->pxtal) && IS_ERR(drvdata->pclkin)) {
> +               dev_err(&client->dev, "missing at least one parent clock\n");
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
>
> Then shouldn't the error message be: "missing both parent clocks\n" ?

Yeah, probably. I'll reword the error message and also check the
variant as only 5351C can have a "clkin" parent clock.

Sebastian