public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: marc.zyngier@arm•com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip: GICv3: ITS: don't assume 64K page size in its_alloc_tables
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 15:09:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5559F294.5070701@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR0301MB074884E252ADE216BD8C472887C40@CY1PR0301MB0748.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>

On 18/05/15 14:38, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:marc.zyngier at arm.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 8:23 AM
>> To: Yoder Stuart-B08248; tglx at linutronix.de
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: GICv3: ITS: don't assume 64K page size in its_alloc_tables
>>
>> Hi Stuart,
>>
>> On 15/05/15 00:02, Stuart Yoder wrote:
>>> its_alloc_tables() needs to account for page sizes other than
>>> 64KB.  Without this change, when PAGE_SIZE=4KB its_alloc_tables()
>>> gets stuck in an infinite loop.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale•com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> think this should go into 4.1 if at all possible...without it I am
>>> unable to boot a 4.1 kernel on the LS2085 SoC
>>
>> What you are suggesting here is a effectively a revert of commit
>> 790b57a, which would break other implementations.
>>
>> Can you please explain the actual issue? I'm failing to see how you end
>> up in an infinite loop here (the system page size and the ITS base
>> granule should be completely unrelated...).
> 
> Here is the problem line:
> 
>       val |= (alloc_size / psz) - 1;
> 
> In our case:
>    alloc_size=16K
>    psz=64K
> 
> ...so (alloc_size / psz) = 0, and thus val becomes -1, and everything
> is screwed up.  We get stuck in a loop to retry_baser:

If alloc_size is 16k, you have an order of 2, and I have to assume this
is an allocation for a device table (otherwise order would be 4). So
things fail because we've computed an alloc_size smaller than what we
want to allocate as a minimum.

Isn't that exactly what Minghuan's patch fixes?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-18 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-14 23:02 [PATCH] irqchip: GICv3: ITS: don't assume 64K page size in its_alloc_tables Stuart Yoder
2015-05-18 13:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-05-18 13:38   ` Stuart Yoder
2015-05-18 14:09     ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-05-18 15:33       ` Stuart Yoder
2015-05-18 15:36         ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5559F294.5070701@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox