Subject: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic: Ensure gic_cpu_if_up/down() programs correct GIC instance

From: [email-masked] (Jon Hunter)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:56:08 +0100

On 30/07/15 17:51, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 30/07/15 17:26, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Commit 3228950621d9 ("irqchip: gic: Preserve gic V2 bypass bits in cpu
>> ctrl register") added a new function, gic_cpu_if_up(), to program the
>> GIC CPU_CTRL register. This function assumes that there is only one GIC
>> instance present and hence always uses the chip data for the primary GIC
>> controller. Although it is not common for there to be a secondary, some
>> devices do support a secondary. Therefore, fix this by passing
>> gic_cpu_if_up() a pointer to the appropriate chip data structure.
>>
>> Similarly, the function gic_cpu_if_down() only assumes that there is a
>> single GIC instance present. Update this function so that an instance
>> number is passed for the appropriate GIC. The vexpress TC2 (which has
>> a single GIC) is currently the only user of this function and so update
>> it accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <[email-masked]>
>> ---
>> I was hoping to make the gic_cpu_if_up/down function more symmetric as we
>> discussed but it is not possible to pass the gic_nr to gic_cpu_if_up()
>> from all the places called without making more changes. However, given
>> that gic_cpu_if_up() is a local function and gic_cpu_if_down() is public,
>> may be it does not matter too much.
>>
>>  arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c |  2 +-
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c       | 14 +++++++-------
>>  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h |  2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c
>> index b3328cd46c33..1aa4ccece69f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c
>> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void tc2_pm_cpu_powerdown_prepare(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster)
>>  	 * to the CPU by disabling the GIC CPU IF to prevent wfi
>>  	 * from completing execution behind power controller back
>>  	 */
>> -	gic_cpu_if_down();
>> +	gic_cpu_if_down(0);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void tc2_pm_cluster_powerdown_prepare(unsigned int cluster)
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
>> index 7566fe259d27..cf9aca22120f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
>> @@ -356,10 +356,10 @@ static u8 gic_get_cpumask(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>>  	return mask;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void gic_cpu_if_up(void)
>> +static void gic_cpu_if_up(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>>  {
>> -	void __iomem *cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(&gic_data[0]);
>> -	void __iomem *dist_base = gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[0]);
>> +	void __iomem *cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(gic);
>> +	void __iomem *dist_base = gic_data_dist_base(gic);
> 
> Which tree is that against? I don't have a dist_base in mainline...

It is based upon linux-next. I can rebase on the current mainline if you
want them for v4.2.

Jon