Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Docs: dt: add generic MSI bindings

From: [email-masked] (Marc Zyngier)
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 11:44:29 +0100

On 27/07/15 10:46, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 09:02:46AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On 23/07/15 17:52, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> Currently msi-parent is used in a couple of drivers despite being fairly
>>> underspecified. This patch adds a generic binding for MSIs (including
>>> the existing msi-parent property) enabling the description of platform
>>> devices capable of using MSIs.
>>>
>>> While MSIs are primarily distinguished by doorbell and payload, some MSI
>>> controllers (e.g. the GICv3 ITS) also use side-band information
>>> accompanying the write to identify the master which originated the MSI,
>>> to allow for sandboxing. This sideband information is non-probeable and
>>> needs to be described in the DT. Other MSI controllers may have
>>> additional configuration details which need to be described per-master.
>>>
>>> This patch adds a generic msi-parent binding document, extending the
>>> de-facto standard with a new (optional) #msi-cells which can be used to
>>> express any per-master configuration and/or sideband data. This is
>>> sufficient to describe non-hotpluggable devices.
>>>
>>> For busses where sideband data may be derived from some bus-specific
>>> master ID scheme, other properties will be required to describe the
>>> mapping.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email-masked]>
>>> ---
>>>  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/msi.txt          | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 135 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/msi.txt
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/msi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/msi.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..c60c034
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/msi.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
>>> +This document describes the generic device tree binding for MSI controllers and
>>> +their master(s).
>>> +
>>> +Message Signaled Interrupts (MSIs) are a class of interrupts generated by a
>>> +write to an MMIO address.
>>> +
>>> +MSIs were originally specified by PCI (and are used with PCIe), but may also be
>>> +used with other busses, and hence a mechanism is required to relate devices on
>>> +those busses to the MSI controllers which they are capable of using,
>>> +potentially including additional information.
>>> +
>>> +MSIs are distinguished by some combination of:
>>> +
>>> +- The doorbell (the MMIO address written to).
>>> +  
>>> +  Devices may be configured by software to write to arbitrary doorbells which
>>> +  they can address. An MSI controller may feature a number of doorbells.
>>> +
>>> +- The payload (the value written to the doorbell).
>>> +  
>>> +  Devices may be configured to write an arbitrary payload chosen by software.
>>> +  MSI controllers may have restrictions on permitted payloads.
>>> +
>>> +- Sideband information accompanying the write.
>>> +  
>>> +  Typically this is neither configurable nor probeable, and depends on the path
>>> +  taken through the memory system (i.e. it is a property of the combination of
>>> +  MSI controller and device rather than a property of either in isolation).
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +MSI controllers:
>>> +================
>>> +
>>> +An MSI controller signals interrupts to a CPU when a write is made to an MMIO
>>> +address by some master. An MSI controller may feature a number of doorbells.
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +--------------------
>>> +
>>> +- msi-controller: Identifies the node as an MSI controller.
>>> +
>>> +Optional properties:
>>> +--------------------
>>> +
>>> +- #msi-cells: The number of cells in an msi-specifier, required if not zero.
>>> +
>>> +  Typically this will encode information related to sideband data, and will
>>> +  not encode doorbells or payloads as these can be configured dynamically.
>>> +
>>> +  The meaning of the msi-specifier is defined by the device tree binding of
>>> +  the specific MSI controller. 
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +MSI clients
>>> +===========
>>> +
>>> +MSI clients are devices which generate MSIs. For each MSI they wish to
>>> +generate, the doorbell and payload may be configured, though sideband
>>> +information may not be configurable.
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +--------------------
>>> +
>>> +- msi-parent: A list of phandle + msi-specifier pairs, one for each MSI
>>> +  controller which the device is capable of using.
>>> +
>>> +  This property is unordered, and MSIs may be allocated from any combination of
>>> +  MSI controllers listed in the msi-parent property.
>>> +
>>> +  If a device has restrictions on the allocation of MSIs, these restrictions
>>> +  must be described with additional properties.
>>> +
>>> +  When #msi-cells is non-zero, busses with an msi-parent will require
>>> +  additional properties to describe the relationship between devices on the bus
>>> +  and the set of MSIs they can potentially generate.
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +Example
>>> +=======
>>> +
>>> +/ {
>>> +	#address-cells = <1>;
>>> +	#size-cells = <1>;
>>> +
>>> +	msi_a: msi-controller at a {
>>> +		reg = <0xa 0xf00>;
>>> +		compatible = "vendor-a,some-controller";
>>> +		msi-controller;
>>> +		/* No sideband data, so #msi-cells omitted */
>>> +	};
>>> +
>>> +	msi_b: msi-controller at b {
>>> +		reg = <0xb 0xf00>;
>>> +		compatible = "vendor-b,another-controller";
>>> +		msi-controller;
>>> +		/* Each device has some unique ID */
>>> +		#msi-cells = <1>;
>>> +	};
>>> +
>>> +	msi_c: msi-controller at c {
>>> +		reg = <0xb 0xf00>;
>>> +		compatible = "vendor-b,another-controller";
>>> +		msi-controller;
>>> +		/* Each device has some unique ID */
>>> +		#msi-cells = <1>;
>>> +	};
>>> +
>>> +	dev at 0 {
>>> +		reg = <0x0 0xf00>;
>>> +		compatible = "vendor-c,some-device";
>>> +
>>> +		/* Can only generate MSIs to msi_a */
>>> +		msi-parent = <&msi_a>;
>>> +	};
>>> +
>>> +	dev at 1 {
>>> +		reg = <0x1 0xf00>;
>>> +		compatible = "vendor-c,some-device";
>>> +
>>> +		/* 
>>> +		 * Can generate MSIs to either A or B.
>>> +		 */
>>> +		msi-parent = <&msi_a>, <&msi_b 0x17>;
>>> +	};
>>> +
>>> +	dev at 2 {
>>> +		reg = <0x2 0xf00>;
>>> +		compatible = "vendor-c,some-device";
>>> +		/*
>>> +		 * Has different IDs at each MSI controller.
>>> +		 * Can generate MSIs to all of the MSI controllers.
>>> +		 */
>>> +		msi-parent = <&msi_a>, <&msi_b 0x17>, <&msi_c 0x53>;
>>> +	};
>>> +};
>>>
>>
>> This looks quite good for the non-PCI stuff. Should you also cover the
>> PCI usage of msi-parent?
> 
> As far as I can tell, the current PCI usage of msi-parent is practically
> identical to the generic usage, with the proviso that the devices under
> a PCI root complex are assumed to be indistinguishable from the root
> complex from the PoV of the MSI controller.
> 
> So I'm not sure what would be relevant to describe here.
> 
>> I'm can't really see the meaning of #msi-cells in that context. Should
>> it be entirely ignored? OR did you have some specific usage in mind?
> 
> It shouldn't be ignored; if the MSI controller has a non-zero #msi-cells
> then it requires that information to operate correctly (e.g. to
> distinguish masters).
> 
> It may simply be that all devices under the root complex are
> indistinguishable from each other, but can be distinguished form other
> devices in the system using the same MSI controller.
> 
> I also imagine that there may be PCI root complexes which signal their
> own management interrupts as MSIs. Such a root complex needs msi-parent
> to describe its relationship with the MSI controller, which is distinct
> from the relationship between its children and the MSI controller.

Looks tortuous, but why not... ;-)

As an aside, the GICv3 ITS part of the non-PCI MSI support which is
queued for 4.3 is using now this binding to find out about the deviceID,
and I believe Ma Jun is going to use this for his mbigen driver.

I also have additional patches for the core code to parse some of the
properties.

Thanks,

	M.

It would be good if we could make some forward progress to merge this
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...