Subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] xen: Use the correctly the Xen memory terminologies

From: [email-masked] (Boris Ostrovsky)
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 08:19:32 -0400

On 08/05/2015 06:51 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
>>> b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
>>> index 09dc447..25e3cce 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
>>> @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ static int xenfb_remove(struct xenbus_device *dev)
>>>      static unsigned long vmalloc_to_mfn(void *address)
>>>    {
>>> -    return pfn_to_mfn(vmalloc_to_pfn(address));
>>> +    return pfn_to_gfn(vmalloc_to_pfn(address));
>>>    }
>> Are you sure? This will return vmalloc_to_pfn(address)).
> I guess you mean vmalloc_to_mfn will return vmalloc_to_pfn?
>
> If so, it will be only the case on auto-translated case (because pfn ==
> gfn). In the case of PV, the mfn will be returned.

How will mfn be returned on PV when pfn_to_gfn() is an identity function?

static inline unsigned long pfn_to_gfn(unsigned long pfn)
  {
      return pfn;
  }

-boris

>
> Although, this function is misnamed. It's fixed in a follow-up patch
> (see #6) because it's required more renaming than this function. I
> didn't want to add such changes within this patch.
>
> Regards,
>