Subject: [PATCH 5/6] irqchip: GICv3: Don't deactivate interrupts forwarded to a guest

From: [email-masked] (Eric Auger)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:03:12 +0200

On 07/09/2015 03:19 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Commit 0a4377de3056 ("genirq: Introduce irq_set_vcpu_affinity() to
> target an interrupt to a VCPU") added just what we needed at the
> lowest level to allow an interrupt to be deactivated by a guest.
> 
> When such a request reaches the GIC, it knows it doesn't need to
> perform the deactivation anymore, and can safely leave the guest
> do its magic. This of course requires additional support in both
> VFIO and KVM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> index e02592b..a1ca9e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ static inline int gic_irq_in_rdist(struct irq_data *d)
>  	return gic_irq(d) < 32;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool forwarded_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	return d->handler_data != NULL;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void __iomem *gic_dist_base(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d))	/* SGI+PPI -> SGI_base for this CPU */
> @@ -231,6 +236,12 @@ static void gic_poke_irq(struct irq_data *d, u32 offset)
>  static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	gic_poke_irq(d, GICD_ICENABLER);
> +	/*
> +	 * When masking a forwarded interrupt, make sure it is
> +	 * deactivated as well.
To me it is not straightforward to understand why a forwarded IRQ would
need to be DIR'ed when masked. This is needed because of the disable_irq
optimisation, I would add a related comment.

Eric
> +	 */
> +	if (static_key_true(&supports_deactivate) && forwarded_irq(d))
> +		gic_poke_irq(d, GICD_ICACTIVER);
>  }
>  
>  static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> @@ -296,8 +307,11 @@ static int gic_irq_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
>  static void gic_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	if (static_key_true(&supports_deactivate)) {
> -		/* No need to deactivate an LPI */
> -		if (gic_irq(d) >= 8192)
> +		/*
> +		 * No need to deactivate an LPI, or an interrupt that
> +		 * is is getting forwarded to a vcpu.
> +		 */
> +		if (gic_irq(d) >= 8192 || forwarded_irq(d))
>  			return;
>  		gic_write_dir(gic_irq(d));
>  	} else {
> @@ -331,6 +345,16 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
>  	return gic_configure_irq(irq, type, base, rwp_wait);
>  }
>  
> +static int gic_irq_set_vcpu_affinity(struct irq_data *d, void *vcpu)
> +{
> +	if (static_key_true(&supports_deactivate)) {
> +		d->handler_data = vcpu;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
>  static u64 gic_mpidr_to_affinity(u64 mpidr)
>  {
>  	u64 aff;
> @@ -678,6 +702,7 @@ static struct irq_chip gic_chip = {
>  	.irq_set_affinity	= gic_set_affinity,
>  	.irq_get_irqchip_state	= gic_irq_get_irqchip_state,
>  	.irq_set_irqchip_state	= gic_irq_set_irqchip_state,
> +	.irq_set_vcpu_affinity	= gic_irq_set_vcpu_affinity,
>  	.flags			= IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED,
>  };
>  
>