From: nicolas.ferre@atmel•com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] power: reset: at91-shdwc: add new shutdown controller driver
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:44:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56090BFC.10006@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150924110652.GW4287@piout.net>
Le 24/09/2015 13:06, Alexandre Belloni a ?crit :
> On 22/09/2015 at 17:57:52 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote :
>> +config POWER_RESET_AT91_SHDWC
>
> Maybe we should start numbering, at91-poweroff is already a driver for
> an shdwc.
>
>> +#define SLOW_CLOCK_FREQ 32768
>> +
>
> The slow clock is an input to the shdwc, then you have to get it,
> prepare and enable it. The you could use clk_get_rate.
Okay, sure: I modify the driver to take your enhancements into account.
> By duplicating the driver, you are repeating mistakes from the past ;)
Hey! look at the common parts that these drivers would share if it was
merged and you would realize that it was not worth the effort: I tried
and judged it was completely pointless.
>> +static void at91_poweroff(void)
>> +{
>> + BUG_ON(!at91_shdwc);
>
> Is that condition even possible?
No it's not. I remove it.
>
>> +
>> + writel(AT91_SHDW_KEY | AT91_SHDW_SHDW,
>> + at91_shdwc->at91_shdwc_base + AT91_SHDW_CR);
>
> This is not properly aligned.
Why? I prefer it like this and the second line doesn't cross the 80
column so I presume that it's valid.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 at91_shdwc_debouncer_value(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> + u32 in_period_us)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + int max_idx = ARRAY_SIZE(sdwc_dbc_period) - 1;
>> + unsigned long long period_us;
>> + unsigned long long max_period_us = DBC_PERIOD_US(sdwc_dbc_period[max_idx]);
>> +
>> + if (in_period_us > max_period_us) {
>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
>> + "debouncer period %u too big, reduced to %llu us\n",
>> + in_period_us, max_period_us);
>> + return max_idx;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = max_idx - 1; i > 0; i--) {
>> + period_us = DBC_PERIOD_US(sdwc_dbc_period[i]);
>> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "%s: ref[%d] = %llu\n",
>> + __func__, i, period_us);
> ditto
>
>
>> + if (in_period_us > period_us)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return i + 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 at91_shdwc_get_wakeup_input(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> + struct device_node *np)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *cnp;
>> + const char *pm;
>> + u32 wk_input_mask;
>> + u32 wuir = 0;
>> + u32 wk_input;
>> +
>> + for_each_child_of_node(np, cnp) {
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(cnp, "reg", &wk_input)) {
>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "reg property is missing for %s\n",
>> + cnp->full_name);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + wk_input_mask = 1 << wk_input;
>> + if (!(wk_input_mask & AT91_SHDW_WKUPEN_MASK)) {
>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
>> + "wake-up input %d out of bounds ignore\n",
>> + wk_input);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + wuir |= wk_input_mask;
>> +
>> + if (!of_property_read_string(cnp, "atmel,wakeup-type", &pm)) {
>> + if (!strcasecmp(pm, "high"))
>> + /*
>> + * only add a type if "high" is specified. Low
>> + * is the default.
>> + */
>> + wuir |= AT91_SHDW_WKUPT(wk_input);
>> + }
>> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "%s: (child %d) wuir = %#x\n",
>> + __func__, wk_input, wuir);
>
> ditto
>
>> +static int at91_shdwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>> +
>> + if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + at91_shdwc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*at91_shdwc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!at91_shdwc)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, at91_shdwc);
>> +
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + at91_shdwc->at91_shdwc_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>> + if (IS_ERR(at91_shdwc->at91_shdwc_base)) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not map reset controller address\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(at91_shdwc->at91_shdwc_base);
>> + }
>> +
>> + match = of_match_node(at91_shdwc_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
>> + if (match != NULL)
>
> match will never be NULL, else you wouldn't be probed. You can remove that test.
I'll remove this and repost the driver as v3.
Thanks, bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-28 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-10 10:35 [PATCH 1/3] power: reset: at91-reset/trivial: driver applies to SAMA5 family as well Nicolas Ferre
2015-09-10 10:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: at91/dt: shdwc binding: add new shutdown controller documentation Nicolas Ferre
2015-09-10 10:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] power: reset: at91-shdwc: add new shutdown controller driver Nicolas Ferre
2015-09-22 13:59 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-09-22 15:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Nicolas Ferre
2015-09-24 11:06 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-09-28 9:44 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-09-22 13:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] power: reset: at91-reset/trivial: driver applies to SAMA5 family as well Sebastian Reichel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56090BFC.10006@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox