Subject: [PATCH v4] twd: Don't set CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP unconditionally

From: [email-masked] (Mason)
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 20:16:24 +0200

On 08/10/2015 19:43, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 07:38:53PM +0200, Mason wrote:
>> On 08/10/2015 19:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> Otherwise this looks ok. If you can respin with the above wording, and
>>> s/twd-never-stops/always-on/ in the patch, you can add:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email-masked]>
>>
>> Wouldn't you feel like going all-in and Signing-off? ;-)
> 
> Then I'd reject it, because it would be wrong.
> 
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches: [snip]

Could someone explain the difference between Acked-by and
Reviewed-by?

Regards.