Subject: [PATCH v4] twd: Don't set CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP unconditionally

From: [email-masked] (Mason)
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 20:37:23 +0200

On 08/10/2015 20:22, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:16:24PM +0200, Mason wrote:
>> On 08/10/2015 19:43, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 07:38:53PM +0200, Mason wrote:
>>>> On 08/10/2015 19:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>>> Otherwise this looks ok. If you can respin with the above wording, and
>>>>> s/twd-never-stops/always-on/ in the patch, you can add:
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email-masked]>
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't you feel like going all-in and Signing-off? ;-)
>>>
>>> Then I'd reject it, because it would be wrong.
>>>
>>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches: [snip]
>>
>> Could someone explain the difference between Acked-by and
>> Reviewed-by?
> 
> Again, I could quote from the above file, but you already have a copy
> of it locally, so you could just read that version instead.  Section 13.

Acked-by: [...] is a record that the acker has at least
reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance.

Reviewed-by: indicates that the patch has been reviewed and
found acceptable according to the Reviewer's Statement

IIUC Acked-by is stronger than Reviewed-by?

Regards.