Subject: [PATCH V3 2/4] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA management driver

From: [email-masked] (Sinan Kaya)
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 21:17:20 -0500

On 11/8/2015 12:08 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:

On 11/8/2015 12:08 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> +    val = val & ~(MAX_BUS_REQ_LEN_MASK << MAX_BUS_WR_REQ_BIT_POS);
>> +    val = val | (mgmtdev->max_write_request << MAX_BUS_WR_REQ_BIT_POS);
>> +    val = val & ~(MAX_BUS_REQ_LEN_MASK);
>> +    val = val | (mgmtdev->max_read_request);
>
> val &= ~MAX_BUS_REQ_LEN_MASK << MAX_BUS_WR_REQ_BIT_POS;
> val |= mgmtdev->max_write_request << MAX_BUS_WR_REQ_BIT_POS;
> val &= ~MAX_BUS_REQ_LEN_MASK;
> val |= mgmtdev->max_read_request;
>
>> +static const struct of_device_id hidma_mgmt_match[] = {
>> +    { .compatible = "qcom,hidma-mgmt", },
>> +    { .compatible = "qcom,hidma-mgmt-1.0", },
>> +    { .compatible = "qcom,hidma-mgmt-1.1", },
>> +    {},
>> +};
>
> I thought Rob said that he did NOT want to use version numbers in
> compatible strings.  And what's the difference between these three
> versions anyway?
>

This was already discussed here.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/2/689

The agreement was to use

compatible = "qcom,hidma-mgmt-1.1", "qcom,hidma-mgmt-1.0", 
"qcom,hidma-mgmt";

I'll be adding code for v1.1 specifically in the future.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a 
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project