Subject: [PATCH 03/11] dt-bindings: clock: add NXP LPC32xx clock list for consumers

From: [email-masked] (Vladimir Zapolskiy)
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 19:58:06 +0200

On 20.11.2015 15:56, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 20 November 2015 03:05:03 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> +
>> +/* LPC32XX System Control Block clocks */
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_RTC                0
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_DMA                1
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_MLC                2
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_SLC                3
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_LCD                4
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_MAC                5
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_SD         6
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_DDRAM      7
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_SSP0       8
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_SSP1       9
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_UART3      10
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_UART4      11
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_UART5      12
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_UART6      13
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_IRDA       14
>> +#define LPC32XX_CLK_I2C1       15
>>
> 
> Any chance we can avoid the include file? This is going to make it really
> hard to merge everything in one merge window with the dependencies between
> the driver, the bindings and the platform code.

I see only one option to avoid this commit, namely squash it with the
CCF driver and merge it before making changes in DTS.

However I suppose ARM trees won't be synced on clk tree, so probably it
won't simplify maintainer's work.

> If there is a way to describe the clocks based on numbers from the
> data sheet instead of making up your own, that makes life much
> easier for us.

There are no any clock numbers in the datasheet, unfortunately.

--
Vladimir