Subject: [RFC v02 03/15] dmaengine: core: Introduce new, universal API to request a channel

From: [email-masked] (Peter Ujfalusi)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 11:48:34 +0200

On 11/30/2015 04:09 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 30 November 2015 15:45:33 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>                                                   const char *name);
>>  struct dma_chan *dma_request_slave_channel(struct device *dev, const char *name);
>> +
>> +struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan(struct device *dev, const char *name);
>> +struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan_by_mask(const dma_cap_mask_t *mask);
>> +
>>  void dma_release_channel(struct dma_chan *chan);
>>  int dma_get_slave_caps(struct dma_chan *chan, struct dma_slave_caps *caps);
>>  #else
>> @@ -1268,6 +1291,14 @@ static inline struct dma_chan *dma_request_slave_channel(struct device *dev,
>>  {
>>         return NULL;
>>  }
>> +static inline struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +       return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +}
>>
> 
> The prototypes for dma_request_chan() don't match, otherwise looks good.

Aargh, the !CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE path...
Fixed for the next RFC

Thanks,
P?ter